FundoRing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus FundoRing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
NCT07486765 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2026-03-20
Summary
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and durable treatment of severe obesity and its co-morbidities.
Gastric bypass is one of the main MBS procedures and is performed using various surgical techniques. The main postoperative bariatric complication after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is bile reflux, and the main disadvantage of traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is dumping syndrome.
The successful strategies for avoiding reflux esophagitis and other complication following gastric bypass is the use FundoRing method for gastric bypass with creation fundoplication employing the excluded (remnant) part of the stomach. Routine use of a modified fundoplication of the OAGB-excluded stomach to treat patients with obesity decreased acid and prevented bile reflux esophagitis significantly more effectively than standard OAGB. However, the anastomosis after OAGB is constantly bathed in bile. This was previously thought to significantly increase the risk of ulcers, but modern data shows that bile may even have a "protective" buffering effect, neutralizing acid, although the risk of alkaline gastritis remains. The results of trial of consequences of reflux bile flow from the intestine into the gastric pouch after OAGB are controversial. How does this affect the incidence of marginal ulcers due to enterogastric reflux? The answers to these questions remain unclear.
The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of distal gastric pouch inflammation and the likelihood of marginal ulcers in patients treated with the FundoRing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus the FundoRing OAGB.
Conditions
- Obesity
- Roux-en-y Anastomosis Site
- Reflux Gastritis
- Reflux Esophagitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic FundoRing gastric bypass
Laparoscopic gastric bypass is a minimally invasive weight loss surgery that reduces the stomach's volume to 20 ml (separated stomach to gastric pouch (small part) and remnant (excluded, large) part) and reroutes the small intestine from the gastric pouch, bypassing the duodenum, into the jejunum, limiting food intake and reducing calorie absorption. Additionally, the esophagus and the upper part of the gastric pouch were wrapped with the upper part (fundus) of the excluded (remnant) part of stomach using the FundoRing method.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons of Kazakhstan
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Oral Ospanov, Professor · The Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons of Kazakhstan
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-04
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-12
- Completion
- 2026-03-13
Countries
- Kazakhstan
More Related Trials
-
RCT Comparing OAGB and Long Limb Roux Gastric Bypass
NCT04812132 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Biliary Reflux After Mini-gastric Bypass With Using the Biliary Reflux Index
NCT04845438 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Follow up After SG vs RYGB vs OAGB
NCT03467646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB) Safety and Efficacy Short-term Study
NCT02290418 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MINI Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Bypass: Differences in HOrmonal Secretions at 2 Years of Surgery
NCT03482895 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Same-Day and One Day Gastric Bypass by Use the "FundoRing" Method (Same-Day_FundoRing Trial)
NCT07189416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MGB/OAGB Versus RYGB After Failed Sleeve
NCT03526783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Omega Loop Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02139813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Clinical Trial
NCT04649619 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Short vs. Long Biliopancreatic Limb Gastric Bypass
NCT04609449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Revisional Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Ringed Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT07436013 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of RING on Gastroesophageal Reflux (GERD) After RYGBP
NCT01212835 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Long or Very Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in Superobese
NCT00868543 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Management of Symptomatic Gastric Sleeve Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04781946 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT01078181 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Regain Rate According to gj Anastomosis Size in Gastric Bypass
NCT05655975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Banded-versus-Standard Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT01504685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux En-y Gastric Bypass
NCT05746936 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass
NCT03045679 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
NCT04852198 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02475590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Comparison of Lap and Robotic-Assisted RYGB and SG
NCT04329780 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Standard Versus "Single Loop" Bypass After Parietal Gastrectomy
NCT07115836 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass As Revisional Procedures Following Failed Restrictive Bariatric Surgery
NCT06794892 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT00667706 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4