MedTrace Logo

A Comparison Between Short vs. Long Biliopancreatic Limb Gastric Bypass

NCT04609449 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 192

Last updated 2020-11-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Prospective study including patients submitted to RYGB (n=94) and L-RYGB (n=94) at a single institution. The aim was to compare the effect on comorbidities and weight loss of a long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-RYGB), compared with a standard RYGB. Procedure selection was randomly assigned (1:1), and surgeries were performed, during 24 months (2016-2017). Weight loss, comorbidities control and nutritional status were assessed at baseline and 12 months.

Conditions

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Metabolic Surgery
  • Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

PROCEDURE

Standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • CARLOS ZERRWECK LOPEZ

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Carlos Zerrweck, MD · Head of Department. The Obesity Clinic at Hospital General Tlahuac

  • Antonio Herrera, MD · The Obesity Clinic at Hospital General Tlahuac

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-12-31
Completion
2018-12-31

Countries

  • Mexico

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04609449 on ClinicalTrials.gov