Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block With Preserved Ejection Fraction

NCT07464041 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-03-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been associated with ventricular dyssynchrony and an increased risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, which may lead to worse clinical outcomes. These adverse effects are more pronounced in patients with pre-existing left ventricular dysfunction. To overcome these limitations, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which directly engages the cardiac conduction system to preserve physiological ventricular activation, has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice.

However, in patients with atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%), evidence demonstrating the long-term clinical superiority of LBBAP over conventional RVP remains limited. As a result, both pacing strategies continue to be used in current practice. This multicenter randomized trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and lead stability of LBBAP using a stylet-driven extendable screw-in lead versus conventional RVP in patients with atrioventricular block and preserved ejection fraction.

Conditions

  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Left Bunde Branch Area Pacing
  • Conduction System Pacing

Interventions

DEVICE

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Left bundle branch area pacing performed using a stylet-driven extendable screw-in pacing lead to achieve physiological ventricular activation in patients with atrioventricular block.

DEVICE

Right venticular pacing

Conventional right ventricular pacing performed with a standard transvenous pacing lead for treatment of atrioventricular block.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-29
Primary Completion
2027-06-30
Completion
2027-06-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07464041 on ClinicalTrials.gov