Assessment of the Feasibility of Frozen Embryo Transfers in a Natural Cycle Among Obese Compared to Non-Obese Patients
NCT07450300 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1831
Last updated 2026-03-04
Summary
This retrospective study included 1,831 single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles performed between November 1, 2022 and August 31, 2025. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used according to ovulatory status, cycle duration, and characteristics of previous FET cycles: modified natural cycle with ovulation trigger (mNC-FET) (n = 770), stimulated cycle FET (SC-FET) (n = 468), and hormone replacement therapy FET (HRT-FET) (n = 593). In natural cycles, if the predefined criteria for ovulation trigger were not met, the cycle was converted to a stimulated cycle. The aim of this study was to determine whether body mass index affects embryo transfer feasibility, reproductive outcomes, and cycle characteristics across different FET protocols.
Conditions
- Infertility, Female
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Modified natural cycle
In the modified natural cycle group, patients underwent ultrasound and hormonal monitoring to track spontaneous follicular development. When the leading follicle reached an appropriate size and endometrial thickness was adequate, ovulation was triggered using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to schedule frozen embryo transfer.
- PROCEDURE
-
Substitued cycle
In the stimulated cycle group, mild ovarian stimulation was performed using oral agents and/or low-dose gonadotropins to promote follicular development. Follicular growth was monitored by ultrasound, and ovulation was either triggered with hCG or occurred spontaneously, allowing scheduling of frozen embryo transfer.
- PROCEDURE
-
Hormonal replacement therapy
In the hormone replacement therapy group, endometrial preparation was achieved through exogenous estrogen administration. Once adequate endometrial thickness was confirmed, progesterone supplementation was initiated to mimic the luteal phase and schedule frozen embryo transfer.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clinique Mathilde
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-08-31
- Completion
- 2026-01-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Natural Cycle, Minimal Stimulation and Conventional IVF: a Registry-based Study
NCT05125497 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Natural Cycles With Spontaneous Versus Induced Ovulation in FET
NCT03581422 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Frozen Blastocyst Transfer in Natural Cycle
NCT01892826 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Convenience of Natural Proliferative Phase Frozen Embryo Transfer
NCT06307184 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Reduced Oestrogen Dosage to Improve the Outcome of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer
NCT05545592 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Transfers of Fresh and Thawed Embryos in Patients With Prior Failed Embryo Transfer Cycles
NCT00736177 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Endometrial Compaction on Reproductive Outcomes After Cryotransfer of Euploid Embryos in a Natural Cycle
NCT05960370 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Transfer of Frozen Embryos in Natural Cycle: Evaluation of Impact of Spontaneous Versus HCG-triggered Ovulation on Pregnancy Rate
NCT03428165 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Endometrial Compaction in Euploid Frozen Embryo Transfers
NCT04330066 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Success Rate Natural Cycles Versus Modified Natural Cycles in Frozen Embryos
NCT03798886 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfers
NCT05215119 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Freeze-thaw Embryo Transfer Cycles in Women With Recurrent Implantation Failure
NCT06991530 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Two Freezing Techniques
NCT00852306 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of the Presence of the Corpus Luteum on Pregnancies Obtained Through Frozen Embryo Transfer(FET)
NCT06896617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of Embryo Cryopreservation on Birth Weight
NCT03989843 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Impact of Past Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Infection on the Live Birth Rates of Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles
NCT05739019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Live Birth After Fresh Embryo Transfer Vs Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
NCT01841528 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Comparison of Pregnancy Outcome of Infertile Patients After Fresh and Warmed Single Blastocyst Transfer From 2014 to 2018.
NCT04310761 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Transfers of Thawed Blastocysts Versus Blastocysts Derived From Thawed Bipronuclear Oocytes
NCT01247987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pregnancy Rate in Direct Versus Afterload Technique of Embryo Transfer
NCT05364528 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Replacement of Fresh Embryo Transfers (ETs) by Frozen Embryo Transfers (FETs) Using Vitrification
NCT00823121 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Immediate Versus Postponed Freeze-all Embryo Transfer in Hyperresponders
NCT05483270 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cumulative Live Birth Rate With eSET After Preimplantation Genetic Screening Versus Conventional In-vitro Fertilization
NCT03118141 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Elastography: a Potential Predictor of Embryo Transfer Success
NCT05397912 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Triggering Ovulation at Follicle Size Smaller or Larger Than 17mm in a Modified Natural Cycle
NCT07088952 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA