Pelvic Floor Peritoneal Closure to Prevent Postoperative Ileus in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT07432542 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 516
Last updated 2026-02-25
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether closing the pelvic floor peritoneum during laparoscopic radical resection of mid-low rectal cancer can reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus. This study will also assess the impact of pelvic floor peritoneal closure on patient recovery and quality of life after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Can closing the pelvic floor peritoneum reduce the incidence of ileus within 30 days after surgery in patients with mid-low rectal cancer?
2. What is the impact of pelvic floor peritoneal closure on postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage and pelvic infection?
3. How do the two surgical approaches differ in their effects on patients' postoperative anal function, urinary function, and quality of life?
Researchers will compare two approaches after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer: closing the pelvic floor peritoneum versus not closing it, to observe which method more effectively prevents postoperative ileus.
Participants will:
1. Undergo laparoscopic radical resection with anus preservation for mid-low rectal cancer
2. Receive either pelvic floor peritoneal closure or non-closure treatment based on random assignment
3. Attend regular follow-up visits to evaluate intestinal function recovery and occurrence of complications
4. Complete quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 scale) at 6 months after surgery
Conditions
- Rectal Cancer Surgery
- Middle and Low Rectal Cancer
- Intestinal Obstruction
- Ileus
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction
After laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, the right pelvic floor peritoneum was continuously sutured and closed with 3-0 absorbable sutures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sun Yat-sen University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-05-31
- Completion
- 2028-05-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Mesh Reinforcement During Temporary Stoma Closure After Sphincter-Saving Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT02576184 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes of Day Surgery for Patients With CuRC
NCT04646915 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Diverting Ileostomy and Anal Functional Outcomes After Anus Preservation Surgery
NCT04776421 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT03731754 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RISE Ileocecal Valve Functional Reconstruction
NCT07167420 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic IIeocecus-Sparing Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer of the Hepatic Flexure and Proximal Transverse Colon
NCT04479111 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PReventive cOlostomy vs Ileostomy in Low anTErior reCTal Resection
NCT04357171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00726622 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01423214 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT04527861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Bowel Dysfunction Program After Low Anterior Resection
NCT04733794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pilot Study for Evaluation of the Need for Protective Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection Due to Rectal Cancer
NCT00457327 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Urinary Retention Following taTME VS laTME Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT06147492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Closure Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anteriresection for Rectal Cancer
NCT03746353 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients
NCT02564224 ·Status: NO_LONGER_AVAILABLE
-
Robotic vs. TaTME Rectal Surgery (ROTA STUDY)
NCT04200027 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04853784 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Prospective Clinical Study for Laparoscopic D3 Dissection With Preservation of Left Colic Artery in Rectal Cancer
NCT02753465 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT03413904 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02673177 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Application of Overlap Method to Digestive Tract Reconstruction of Totally Laparoscopic Left Colectomy
NCT05034692 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Value of Left Colic Artery in Laparoscopic Radical Rectectomy
NCT03349788 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA