MedTrace Logo

Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients

NCT02564224 · Status: NO_LONGER_AVAILABLE · Type: EXPANDED_ACCESS

Last updated 2018-06-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pursestring Wound Closure

Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure

PROCEDURE

Conventional Wound Closure

Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure

DEVICE

prolene

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zhejiang University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02564224 on ClinicalTrials.gov