MedTrace Logo

Clinical and Patient Outcomes of 4 mm Ultra-Short vs. 8 mm Implants With Bone Augmentation in the Back Upper Jaw

NCT07417293 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 35

Last updated 2026-02-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare 2 different groups of patients with both a healed site in the upper posterior sector after extractions, one treated with ultra-short implants, and another with long implants with bone regeneration. The objective is to evaluate if short-implants are superior in terms of better clinical outcomes, survival rates and safety, reduced surgical time, postoperative discomfort, and complication risk compared to conventional implants and bone regeneration.

Conditions

  • Posterior Atrophic Maxilla

Interventions

DEVICE

Ultra short implants

Placement of an ultra short implant of 4mm in the posterior atrophic maxilla without any bone regeneration procedure

DEVICE

Long implants with bone augmentation

Placement of long implants of 8mm in the posterior atrophic maxilla alongside bone augmentation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-02-20
Primary Completion
2028-07-01
Completion
2029-07-01
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07417293 on ClinicalTrials.gov