LLL vs. SDL for LBBP: A Non-inferiority RCT

NCT07378124 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 288

Last updated 2026-02-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) has emerged as one of the most commonly used physiological pacing modalities in clinical practice. However, the key determinants of procedural success lie in the accurate intraoperative identification of proper LBB lead positioning and the prevention of cardiac perforation. Our previous research has established a methodology for Lumenless Lead (LLL) implantation under the guidance of continuous pacing monitoring, and this methodology has been further adapted for Stylet-driven Lead (SDL) implantation. The present study is designed as a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, aiming to compare the differences in efficacy and safety between LLL and SDL during LBBP procedures guided by continuous pacing monitoring, with the presence of S-V dissociation serving as the criterion for confirming optimal LBB lead positioning.

Conditions

  • Bradycardia
  • Conduction Block, Atrioventricular

Interventions

PROCEDURE

SDL implantation

Implantation of an SDL during LBBP procedures guided by continuous pacing monitoring, with the presence of S-V dissociation serving as the criterion for confirming optimal LBB lead positioning.

PROCEDURE

LLL implantation

Implantation of an LLL during LBBP procedures guided by continuous pacing monitoring, with the presence of S-V dissociation serving as the criterion for confirming optimal LBB lead positioning.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ningbo No.2 Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-01-24
Primary Completion
2027-06-30
Completion
2027-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07378124 on ClinicalTrials.gov