MedTrace Logo

Comparing Between Osseodensification Burs Versus Osteotome in Low Bone Density Areas.

NCT07378020 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 13

Last updated 2026-04-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the primary stability of implant sites prepared using conventional drilling, osseodensification (Densah bur), and osteotome preparation techniques, and to evaluate the influence of these methods on implant success rates in areas of low bone density.

Conditions

  • Low Bone Density

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional Osteotomy

The implant site will be prepared using a standard sequence of drills (subtractive osteotomy) according to the implant manufacturer's instructions. Drilling will be performed with profuse irrigation at speed between 800-1200 rpm to remove bone and prepare the osteotomy site to the final diameter before implant insertion

PROCEDURE

Densah Bur drilling

after using the pilot drill in a clockwise direction to drill to the desired depth according to the planned implant length The implant site will be prepared using Densah burs (Versah). the motor is adjusted to rotate in a counter-clockwise direction (densifying mode) at 800-1200 rpm with profuse irrigation. This technique expands the osteotomy site by compacting bone at the periphery rather than removing it, aiming to enhance bone density around the implant then the implant is inserted after reaching the desired diameter according to densah bur soft bone drilling protocol

PROCEDURE

osteotome bone condensation

osteotomy was prepared using (Xive BoneCondensers by dentsply sirona GERMANY) starting from the pilot drill of 1.7mm in diameter to penetrate the cortical bone and gain access. Then instrumentation was done in the following sequence: 2.0mm, 3.0mm, and 3.4mm according to the planned implant diameter. The osteotome was inserted manually and rotated while being pressed towards the apical part of osteotomy till it reaches the full working depth. Once the desired depth was reached, and before moving to the next instrument we wait 1 min for the osteotome to compress and compact the spongy bone. After the implant bed had been prepared, we inserted the implant immediately to avoid any dimensional changes in the site of osteotomy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Future University in Egypt

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • dr lobna abdelaziz aly, PhD · Future University in Egypt

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-01-05
Primary Completion
2025-01-05
Completion
2025-12-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07378020 on ClinicalTrials.gov