MedTrace Logo

Densah Burs vs. Electrical Mallet in Closed Sinus Lifting.

NCT06180187 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2023-12-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the comparative study is to evaluate the density and amount of new bone formed (bone height gain)around dental implant placed simultaneously in posterior maxilla after closed sinus floor elevation using Osseodensification burs versus electrical mallet.

Conditions

  • Alveolar Bone Loss

Interventions

DEVICE

Electrical mallet

elevation of the Schneiderian membrane of maxillary sinus using electrical mallet and place bone graft material to augment the residual alveolar ridge and then place dental implant .

DEVICE

Osseo-densification burs

elevation of the Schneiderian membrane of maxillary sinus using osseodensification burs and place bone graft material to augment the residual alveolar ridge and then place dental implant .

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fayoum University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-12-31
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2025-03-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06180187 on ClinicalTrials.gov