MedTrace Logo

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome

NCT04688957 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2020-12-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. when the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcresta sinus lifting procedures are recommended.

This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.

Conditions

  • Maxillary Sinus Lift

Interventions

PROCEDURE

oseodensification sinus lifting

application of first densah bur with densifying mood (reverse) counterclockwise, 1200 revolution per minute until the sinus is reached then use a wider densah bur with the same mode and bouncing motion to elevate the sinus floor up to 3 mm in 1mm increments.

PROCEDURE

osteotome sinus lifting

drilling implant site with consecutive drills short of the sinus floor by 1-2mm , using osteotome in appropriate size and application of one tap until sinus floor is elevated, using the final drill for the desired implant diameter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-12-12
Primary Completion
2021-07-01
Completion
2021-08-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04688957 on ClinicalTrials.gov