A Study Comparing Sevoflurane and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Needle Aspiration

NCT07338578 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2026-01-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure used to obtain samples from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes or lung parenchymal lesions for diagnostic and staging purposes. The success and safety of the procedure, including diagnostic yield, complication rates, and bronchoscopist comfort, depend largely on the choice of anesthesia technique. General anesthesia is frequently preferred because it provides a stable airway, adequate ventilation, and improved procedural conditions.

Patient-related factors such as medical status, history, procedure duration, and number of needle passes may influence hemodynamic stability and tolerance, making anesthesiologist involvement essential. Previous studies comparing intravenous and inhalational anesthesia in various surgical and bronchoscopic procedures have evaluated their effects on hemodynamics, complications, recovery time, visibility of the surgical field, and postoperative outcomes. However, there is limited evidence directly comparing propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia specifically for EBUS-TBNA.

This study aims to compare the effects of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamic parameters, respiratory stability, and procedure-related complications in patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA. In addition, the study assesses bronchoscopist satisfaction with each anesthetic technique, including procedural comfort and working conditions. The findings are expected to contribute to optimizing anesthetic management for EBUS-TBNA, improving patient safety, and enhancing procedural quality.

Conditions

  • Hemodynamic Stability
  • Pulmonary Diseases or Conditions
  • Complication of Anesthesia

Interventions

DRUG

propofol

In group 1, anesthesia was induced intravenously and maintained using propofol to achieve an adequate depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic stability during EBUS- TBNA. The airway was managed with a size 4 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) allowing bronchoscope insertion and controlled ventilation. Standard monitoring included ECG, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and capnography.

DRUG

Sevoflurane

In group 2, following intravenous induction, anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture to ensure adequate depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic stability during EBUS-TBNA. Airway management was achieved using a size 4 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to facilitate bronchoscope insertion and controlled ventilation. Standard monitoring included ECG, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and capnography.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Burcu Sari, MD · University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

  • Tuna Erturk, MD · University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

  • Suheyla Abitagaoglu, MD · University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-09-01
Primary Completion
2024-03-04
Completion
2024-04-05

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07338578 on ClinicalTrials.gov