Computer Guided Split Thickness Versus Full Thickness Flap Buccal Bone Lid Approach in Hard Mandibular Pathosis
NCT07338136 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26
Last updated 2026-01-15
Summary
* Full thickness Buccal bone lid approach is well known and well reported technique with a superiority on preserving bone volume and better bone healing especially when done using piezoelectrical devices when compared to conventional technique for management of mandibular pathosis, however periosteum disturbance have a negative role regarding vascularity and bone healing, by comparing the split thickness VS full thickness flap design with buccal bone lid approach, this study will highlight if the periosteum preserved attached to the lid improve the healing on mandibular bony pathosis.
* Aim of the study:
determine the effect of split thickness flap vs full thickness flap using a guided bone lid in hard mandibular pathosis in term of bone healing.
Conditions
- Mandibular Diseases
- Guided Surgery
- Guided Surgery Accuracy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
computer guided split thickness flap for buccal bone lid approuch
* After anesthesia administration, a split thickness flap will be elevated. * Guide will be seated according to the pre-planned position. * Periosteal incision will be performed following the external profile of the surgical guide. * The guide will be removed and minimum periosteal reflection will be done. * The guide will be placed again and the bone lid osteotomies will be prepared following the internal profile of the guide using piezoelectrical device. * The guide will be removed again, and the bone lid will be completed and detached with its attached periosteum. * The bony lid with its attached periosteum will be saved in saline solution until fixation. * Pathosis will be removed completely, and the lid will be returned and fixed to its original position using one or more screw. * Suturing with primary closure will be obtained. * Immediate post-operative CBCT will be taken
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2027-02-28
- Completion
- 2027-04-30
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Immediate Implant Using Dual Zone Therapeutic Concept Versus Buccal Gap Fill to Bone Level
NCT03768297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success Following Regenerative Pulpotomy Using Chitosan Hydrogel Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin in Mature Mandibular Molars
NCT06828978 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft
NCT03628170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Poly Tetra Fluro Ethylene vs Native Collagen Membrane for Gbr in Anterior Maxilla
NCT03839615 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Computed Guided Prolotherapy Versus Conventional Prolotherapy
NCT06132594 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Fat Pad vs. Palatal Rotation Scarf Grafts for Soft Tissue Management Around Zygomatic Implants
NCT06968780 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-specific Alloplastic Chin Implant Versus Computer Guided Genioplasty: Soft Tissue Assessment After One Year Follow up
NCT04817930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile Changes Following Autogenous Fat or Onlay Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Augmentation Versus Sliding Genioplasty for Correction of Deficient Chin
NCT03747822 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Computer Guided Versus Conventional Arthrocentesis in Management of Internal Derangements: A Randomized Clinical Study
NCT06205667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Gain In Clinical Attachment And Bone Levels After Treatment of Patients With Intra-bony Defects By Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique Versus Open Flap Debridement.
NCT03570736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Using the Entire Papilla Preservation Technique With and Without Autogenous Bone Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Treatment of Periodontal Intraosseous Defects
NCT06347263 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Surgical Correction of Anterior Vertical Maxillary Excess (Gummy Smile) by Compression Osteogenesis.
NCT06045871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Outcomes of Staged Ridge-splitting Using Piezo-electric Surgery in Atrophic Posterior Mandible
NCT06200077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Vertical Height Augmentation in Segmental Defects Using Combined Vascularized and Non-Vascularized Fibula Flap
NCT04219683 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy With Immediate Implant Placement in Vertically Deficient Anterior Maxilla
NCT04006678 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Manual Therapy and Kinesio Taping on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Following Oral Surgeries
NCT05422703 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
What Are the Three Dimensional Soft Tissue Changes That Occur After Orthognathic Surgery for Skeletal Class II Patients? Pre-test Post-test Quasi Experimental Study
NCT03687307 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Pontic Shield and Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix for Ridge Preservation
NCT07171879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism After Orthognathic Surgery Using Handheld Scanner Versus Optical Scanner A Prospective Clinical Trial
NCT06724497 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Buccal Plate Expansion Technique Versus Guided Bone Regeneration Technique in Socket Preservation in the Aesthetic Zone.
NCT03065803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Inverted Periosteal Pedicle Flap in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT03701191 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation Comparing Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Connective Tissue Graft for Managing Single Gum Recession
NCT07239180 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla
NCT07303374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Flap Closure Techniques on Postoperative Morbidity in Impacted Third Molar Surgery
NCT07198282 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA