Clinical Evaluation of Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Immediate Implant Using Dual Zone Therapeutic Concept Versus Buccal Gap Fill to Bone Level
NCT03768297 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2018-12-07
Summary
Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone is very challenging procedure although it is documented as a promising procedure (Berglundh, Persson and Klinge, 2002)(Cosyn et al., 2011). Extraction is usually accompanied by remodeling of the hard tissues which is more crucial in the anterior maxilla as it affects soft tissue esthetics(Araujo and Lindhe, 2005)(Covani et al., 2004)(Juodzbalys and Wang, 2007). It is well established that implant placement without filling the buccal gap leads to noticeable amount of bone loss at the alveolar contour(Botticelli, Berglundh and Lindhe, 2004)(Sanz et al., 2010). The protocol of immediate implant and temporization serves to provide acceptable esthetic results but soft tissue stability around the implant restoration is not always satisfactory(Noelken et al., 2018).Amount of soft tissue recession can be specified following immediate implant placement, even with flapless technique there is a limited risk of midfacial recession(Cosyn, Hooghe and De Bruyn, 2012).It was found that inadequate bone grafting in the facial defect increases the chance of mid facial recession(Le, Borzabadi-Farahani and Pluemsakunthai, 2014).
Conditions
- Immediate Implant and Bone Graft
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
dual zone concept
immediate implant with bone fill till soft tissue level
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-20
- Primary Completion
- 2019-11-20
- Completion
- 2020-11-20
More Related Trials
-
Peri-implant Tissue Changes Using Dual Zone Concept with Connective Tissue Graft Versus Concentrated Growth Factor
NCT06728696 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
NCT05975515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03770975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Buccal Soft Tissue Contour Changes After Immediate Implant Placement with or Without Connective Tissue Graft
NCT04309006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Aesthetic Zone With Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT05274256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Esthetics Around Immediate Implants in VIP - CT Grafted vs Non-grafted Sites.RCT
NCT03007316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hard Tissue Augmentation With or Without Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Esthetic Implants
NCT07333534 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Evaluation Around Implants Using Prf or a Palatal Pedicle
NCT03224442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Soft Tissue Grafts for Primary Closure Over Immediately Placed Dental Implants
NCT07327047 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT03219944 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Post Extraction Alterations Following Ridge Preservation In The Esthetic Zone Using Partially Demineralized Autogenous Dentine Graft Versus Xenograft
NCT06552793 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Two Incision Techniques on Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes in Immediate Implant Placement in Class II Extraction Sockets of the Esthetic Zone:
NCT07020767 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Connective Tissue Graft Around Implants
NCT03106506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Versus Non-Guided Harvesting Technique of Soft Tissue Graft in Cairo Recession Type I Sites
NCT06603467 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03213483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft
NCT03628170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Immediate Implants In The Esthetic Zone
NCT03802370 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Collagen Cone on the Outcomes of Immediate Dental Implant Placement in Esthetic Zone
NCT06888947 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla
NCT07303374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Autogenous Demineralized Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Graft During Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.
NCT05431998 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft and Hard Tissue Changes After Immediate Single-tooth Replacement
NCT03784430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Outcomes of Badly Broken-down Teeth Treated With Surgical Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04437797 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Peri-implant Tissues Using Socket Shield Technique Versus Xenograft
NCT03684356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Immediate Implant Placement in Aggressive Periodontitis
NCT03218228 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score
NCT03792425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA