Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Diagnosis, Treatment Guidance and Prognosis of Cardiac Masses (CMR)

Summary

The goal of this observational study is to explore the diagnostic accuracy, treatment-guiding value, and prognostic predictive utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with suspected or confirmed cardiac masses. Cardiac masses include neoplastic (primary tumors, secondary metastases) and non-neoplastic (thrombi, pericardial cysts, inflammatory pseudotumors) lesions-primary tumors are extremely rare (incidence: 0.0017%-0.03%), with 75% benign (myxoma accounting for 40%-50%) and 25% malignant (predominantly angiosarcoma), while secondary metastases are 20-40 times more common. Non-neoplastic masses like thrombi are linked to atrial fibrillation and heart failure, with thromboembolism as a fatal complication. Due to non-specific symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea) and pathological heterogeneity, accurate lesion differentiation and outcome prediction remain clinical challenges.

CMR serves as the "silver standard" for non-invasive assessment of cardiac masses, leveraging superior soft tissue resolution, multi-planar imaging, and multi-parameter tissue characterization (T1/T2 weighted imaging, FPP, LGE, T1/T2 mapping, ECV). Multicenter studies confirm its 98.4% overall diagnostic accuracy and 98.4% benign/malignant differentiation accuracy, with excellent consistency with histopathology (Cohen's Kappa = 0.88). However, existing research is mostly retrospective with small samples, lacking systematic validation of quantitative CMR indicators-gaps this study addresses.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does CMR (qualitative + quantitative indicators) accurately differentiate neoplastic/non-neoplastic and benign/malignant cardiac masses (gold standard: histopathology or long-term follow-up)? Can CMR features (size, margin, infiltration, enhancement pattern, T1/T2 values, ECV) guide treatment selection (surgical resection, interventional therapy, medical treatment, conservative follow-up)? Do specific CMR indicators independently predict long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, recurrence, thromboembolism) in patients with cardiac masses? Participants will include patients who undergo CMR for suspected/confirmed cardiac masses Patients receiving routine CMR as part of clinical care will have their CMR images analyzed, treatment plans recorded, and be followed up for 3 years via outpatient visits, telephone, or electronic medical records (at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months) to collect survival status, recurrence, cardiac function changes, and adverse events.

Conditions

• Cardiac Masses

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CMR-Based Tissue Characterization + Lesion-Specific Clinical Management

For the neoplastic cohort: Standardized 3.0T CMR (conventional sequences + quantitative mapping + FPP + LGE) to characterize tumor nature (benign/malignant, primary/metastatic) and guide clinical management (surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surveillance). For the non-neoplastic cohort: CMR to confirm lesion type (thrombus, cyst, etc.) and guide targeted treatment (anticoagulation, surgical excision, anti-inflammatory therapy, or conservative follow-up). All patients complete 3-year long-term follow-up to assess outcomes.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CMR-Based Malignancy Differentiation + Tumor-Nature-Specific Clinical Management

For the benign cohort: Standardized 3.0T CMR (conventional sequences + quantitative mapping + FPP + LGE) to confirm benign nature and guide clinical management (curative surgical resection for symptomatic/large lesions or long-term surveillance for asymptomatic small lesions). For the malignant cohort: CMR to assess tumor invasiveness, metastasis, and cardiac function impact, further guiding individualized treatment (radical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy, palliative therapy, or systemic therapy for primary tumors). All patients complete 3-year long-term follow-up to monitor recurrence and survival outcomes.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CMR-Based Prognostic Stratification + Outcome-Targeted Follow-Up

For both cohorts: Baseline standardized 3.0T CMR evaluation (conventional sequences + quantitative mapping + FPP + LGE) to collect potential prognostic indicators (lesion size, infiltration extent, enhancement pattern, T1/T2 values, ECV). During 3-year follow-up, regular assessments (outpatient visits, CMR re-evaluation, telephone follow-up) are conducted to monitor outcomes. The intervention focuses on analyzing the correlation between baseline CMR features and prognostic status (favorable/unfavorable) to validate CMR's predictive value for long-term outcomes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Minjie Lu

  lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2008-01-01

Primary Completion

2035-11-30

Completion

2035-12-31