Comparison Between Insertion of Bilateral Straight Cages Versus Unilateral Banana Cage in Lumbar Fusion Surgery

NCT07312747 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2025-12-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

\- To compare the clinical outcomes of bilateral straight cages and unilateral banana cage insertion in lumbar interbody fusion surgery, assess radiological outcomes, including intervertebral disc height, lumbar lordosis angle, and radiographic evidence of fusion, evaluate the rate of complications, such as cage migration, subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, and adjacent segment degeneration and analyze differences in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay between the two techniques

Conditions

  • Lumbar Disc Herniation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cages in lumbar fusion surgery

A critical factor in TLIF procedures is the type and positioning of the interbody cage. Traditionally, bilateral straight cages have been inserted to promote symmetrical load sharing and increase the surface area for fusion. This technique aims to ensure even support of the anterior column and reduce the risk of cage subsidence or pseudarthrosis. On the other hand, unilateral insertion of banana-shaped cages has been introduced as a potentially less invasive alternative that simplifies the procedure while still achieving adequate segmental stability and fusion

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-01-01
Primary Completion
2028-01-01
Completion
2028-02-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07312747 on ClinicalTrials.gov