Effectiveness of Endorotor PED® System Versus Conventional Endoscopic Techniques for the Management of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Randomized Single-blinded Controlled Superiority Trial and Cost-utility Analysis
NCT07253350 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64
Last updated 2026-01-30
Summary
This is a national single-blinded prospective multicenter randomized (1:1) controlled trial, with two parallel arms, using a PROBE methodology, including patients with complicated acute necrotizing pancreatitis who require DEN of WON collection after endoscopic drainage. We will compare 2 groups: conventional DEN and DEN with Endorotor®. The study will be offered to all consecutive patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria after endoscopic drainage for WON. Since the time between drainage and the first necrosectomy session is usually at least 48 hours a period of at least 24h will be allowed for the patient to consider options to participate or not. Information and collection of informed consent will be done by an investigating physician.
Conditions
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Endorotor Group
DEN will be performed with Endorotor 3.2 or ENDOROTOR PED® system depending on the position of cystoenterostomy. Endorotor 3.2 is slimmer and enters WON more easily when the transgastric access is located in the upper portion of the stomach). If needed: lavage, aspiration and conventional mechanical debridement could be used in addition during an ENDOROTOR-based DEN session.
- OTHER
-
Conventional group
DEN is performed conventionally with abundant lavage and mechanical debridement using a non-dedicated material (diathermic loop, polypectomy or Dormia basket) to catch pieces of necrosis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
frederic Prat, MD PHD · APHP
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2029-03-31
- Completion
- 2029-11-30
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of FCSEMS and Plastic Stents
NCT02685865 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Transmural Drainage of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis: Plastic vs Metallic Protesis.
NCT03100578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotherapy for Painless Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT05261997 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Pancreatic Stent Placement for Preventing PEP
NCT06250803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pancreatic Duct Stent for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
NCT03115918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical vs Endoscopic Resection of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis Using the Powered Endoscopic Debridement System
NCT06691919 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The PASTEC Study: Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgery for the Treatment of Bile Duct Stricture in Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT02366988 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumen-apposing Metal Stent With or Without Coaxial Plastic Stent for Treatment of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT03923686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Large Caliber Drainage vs. Complete Necrosectomy for Treatment of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT02564965 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-assisted Versus Open Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Pancreatitis (PANACOTTA)
NCT07109180 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Predictive Factors, Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Accessory Pancreatography in CP
NCT06684301 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endoscopic Step-up Approach Vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis
NCT05601687 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Effects of EST and EPBD in Patients With Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
NCT02668081 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endotherapy and/or Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Painless Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT07074379 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Plastic vs Biodegradable Pancreatic Stent in Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Prevention
NCT05307861 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Bedside Placement of Nasal Jejunal Tube Confirmed by Ultrasound Compared to Placement by Endoscope in Patients With SAP
NCT02456155 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Videoendoscopic Drainage of Infected Pancreatic Collections
NCT00061269 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Versus ESWL and Endoscopic Treatment
NCT02971475 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Enhanced Recovery in Acute Pancreatitis
NCT02813876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Computer Aided, Non-invasive, Acoustic Gastrointestinal Surveillance in Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT02433444 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Randomized Trial of Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Endoscopic Interventions in Necrotizing Pancreatitis
NCT05043415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Endoscopic Ultrasound - Based Sphincterotomy or Conservative Treatment in Severe Biliary Pancreatitis
NCT00987428 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Infected Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT03234166 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylactic Sphincterotomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Patients Unfit for Surgery
NCT07238296 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Abstats: Computer-aided, Non-invasive, Acoustic Gastrointestinal Surveillance (AGIS) in Acute Pancreatitis
NCT02412826 ·Status: UNKNOWN