MedTrace Logo

A Trial of Bedside Placement of Nasal Jejunal Tube Confirmed by Ultrasound Compared to Placement by Endoscope in Patients With SAP

NCT02456155 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2015-05-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators assessed the utility of ultrasonography in confirming the position of nasal jejunal tube after bedside placement when compared with endoscopic placement in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Primary endpoint:

Success rate.

Secondary Endpoint:

Adverse effects, Change of intra-abdominal pressure (1h before, 1h after and 3 days after placement), Tolerance of enteral nutrition, Time to approach the target calories.

Conditions

  • Bedside Placement of Nasal Jejunal Tube

Interventions

PROCEDURE

placing nasal jejunal tube with ultrasound

bedside placing nasal jejunal tube with ultrasound confirmation versus placing endoscopically

PROCEDURE

placing nasal jejunal tube endoscopically

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Li Gang

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-01-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02456155 on ClinicalTrials.gov