MedTrace Logo

Evaluation of Impression Accuracy: Digital Scanner Versus Analog Technique

NCT07252869 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 51

Last updated 2025-11-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral impressions obtained using the Trios 3Shape® and Carestream CS 3600™ scanners, as well as traditional analog impressions using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS), in comparison to a gold standard represented by a laboratory scanner in 51 dental models from 42 patients affected by partial edentulism who required at least two implants.

Researchers compare Trios 3Shape®, Carestream CS 3600™ and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) to see if there is a different accuracy.

Conditions

  • Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Measurement

Interventions

OTHER

impression

A Comparative Study of Digital Versus Analog Impressions

OTHER

Digital impression

impression taken by intraoral scanner

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Milan

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-07-15
Primary Completion
2022-12-15
Completion
2022-12-15

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07252869 on ClinicalTrials.gov