A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Iovera Lumbar Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07214844 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 110
Last updated 2026-04-23
Summary
A research study is being conducted to compare two treatments for long-term low back pain:
* One uses the iovera° system, which applies cold to certain nerves in the lower back.
* The other is the standard treatment called radiofrequency ablation, which uses heat.
The primary objective is to find out which treatment works better to reduce back pain. Participants in this study will be randomly placed in one of the two treatment groups. The clinical research team will check on participant pain levels and overall health before and after the procedure for about 12 months. The entire study will last about 14 months for each participant.
Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Chronic
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Iovera Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis
The iovera group will receive fluoroscopic guided medial branch cryoneurolysis with the subject in the prone position under asepsis: * Investigator injects 1% lidocaine at the treatment site using a 25-gauge, 3/4 -inch needle to numb the skin and tissue around the facet joint * Introducer needle is inserted through the skin wheal to the target medial branch nerve below the junction of the superior articular and transverse process * The introducer needle is positioned, and an x-ray image is taken to confirm the needle's position * With the desired introducer needle position confirmed, the iovera Smart Tip is guided through the introducer needle and the handpiece is secured to the Smart Tip. The start/stop button on the iovera° handpiece is then pressed to start the cycle. * After the cycle is complete, Smart Tip can be removed and next treatment cycle can commence ensuring an overlap of the ice ball * The needle is removed, and light compression is applied with gauze
- PROCEDURE
-
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Subjects will receive a fluoroscopic guided RFA medial branch block in the prone position under asepsis: * The Right L4, L5, S1 articular pillars are identified with fluoroscopy at each level and the target points are located * A skin wheal is formed using 5mL 1% Lidocaine and 5mL 0.25% Bupivacaine * A 20-gauge, 10cm needle with a 10mm active tip is inserted using a 15-degree oblique view and a 15-degree caudad angle onto the waist of each pillar at each level * Anterior-posterior and oblique neuroforamen views confirm positioning * Stimulation is performed and recorded to confirm proper needle placement * A mixture of 3mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2mL of 1% Lidocaine is divided and injected at each level * A lesion is then performed at each level at 80 degrees centigrade for 60 seconds * The needles are removed, and bandages applied to the puncture sites * The same procedure is carried out on the opposite side
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Montefiore Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Karina Gritsenko, MD · Montefiore Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-05-31
- Completion
- 2027-05-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection With Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Management
NCT02930057 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Two Different Approaches to Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerves
NCT06283628 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RFA Using Multi-Tined Electrodes vs.Traditional Electrodes for Lumbar Spondylosis
NCT06477094 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation and Lumbar Multifidi
NCT03744260 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy and Cost: Benefit Ratio of 0, 1, and 2 Medial Branch Blocks for Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Denervation
NCT00484159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Lumbar Motion Monitor to Predict Response to Radiofrequency Ablation After Medial Branch Diagnostic Blocks
NCT03894319 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Radiofrequency Ablation: Treatment for Posterior Element Pain From Vertebral Compression Fractures
NCT03651804 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fluoroscopically-guided Epidural Block in the Midthoracic Region: A Comparison of Anterioposterior Versus Oblique View Approach
NCT02300714 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Intradiscal Gelified Ethanol and Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Gelified Ethanol Injection for Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT02343484 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study
NCT02002429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prognostic Factors in Zygapophyseal Osteoarthritis Infiltration: a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT03304730 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain
NCT00681447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety of Spine Radiofrequency Procedures
NCT02210052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Intradiscal Radiofrequency as A Treatment for Radicular Pain From Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT05747807 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Potential Role of SI00B and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Predicting Outcome From Using Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment of Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapsed
NCT05193461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Steroid Injections Given at the "Level of MRI Pathology" Versus at the "Level of Clinical Symptoms" to See if One is More Effective Than the Other.
NCT02196883 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Intra-articular Injection of PRP Versus Corticosteriods in Treatment of Lumbar Facet Disease
NCT04860531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Platelet Lysate vs Saline for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06924853 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Neuroplasty Using Epidural Catheter Combined with Pulsed Radiofrequency (versus Pulsed Radiofrequency Alone
NCT06711419 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Corticosteroids for Low Back Pain
NCT00290589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy
NCT03912519 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Persistent Post-Lumbar Surgery Pain Syndrome (PSPS) Type II is a Common Condition Encountered in Pain Units, With Limited Available Therapeutic Options. Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Administered Via Catheter Has Demonstrated Greater Efficacy Compared to the Transforaminal Approach. This Rand
NCT07156513 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation the Impact of the "Pas" Technique Versus the "Standard" Technique on Radiation Exposure
NCT06918197 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Real-Time Accurate Pathology Inspection and Decompression Study
NCT05347108 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT01850771 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA