The Potential Role of SI00B and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Predicting Outcome From Using Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment of Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapsed
NCT05193461 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2022-01-18
Summary
Chronic lumbar radicular (CLR) pain is a term used to describe neuropathic pain symptoms in the distribution of a particular lumbar nerve root due to disc protrusion, spinal stenosis, facet hypertrophy, or fibrosis after previous surgery. The pathophysiology of CLR pain involves mechanical, inflammatory, and immunologic factors that affect the function of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG).1Treatment methods include oral pain medications, physical therapy, epidural steroid injection (ESI) and surgery. 2,3.
Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) was developed as a modification of the well-known radiofrequency ablation treatment. In conventional radiofrequency ablation, a high frequency alternating current is used to produce coagulative necrosis of the target nerve tissue without any selectivity for nociceptive fibers. However, in PRF, a current in short (20 msec) high voltage bursts is followed by silent phases (480 msec) which allow for heat dissemination, keeping the target tissue controlled below 42°C. 4,5 The mechanisms via which PRF causes analgesia are still not clearly understood, but laboratory experiments have highlighted some possible ways in which it might act, including its effects on neuropathic pain. Clinical use of PRF has been expanding, despite there being limited evidence of clinical efficacy in the form of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 6 There have been few RCTs using PRF-DRG for radicular pain. Van Zundert et al performed an RCT in subjects with cervical radicular pain.7 Simopoulos et al did a pilot study on lumbar radicular pain, but the methodology included application of conventional radiofrequency over PRF in the study group and was not an efficacy trial. As such, the efficacy of PRF-DRG in CLR has never been determined. 8
Neuroplasticity or neuronal plasticity refers to the ability of the nervous system to do neuronal remodeling, formation of novel synapses and birth of new neurons. Neuronal plasticity is intimately linked to cellular responsiveness and may therefore be considered an index of the neuronal capability to restore its function. Failure of such mechanisms might enhance the susceptibility to neuronal injury.9 Neurotrophic factors (NTFs), and in particular the neurotrophin family, play an important role. In fact, besides their classical role in supporting neuronal survival, NTFs finely modulate all the crucial steps of network construction, from neuronal migration to experience-dependent refinement of local connections. It is now well established that NTFs are important mediators of neuronal plasticity also in adulthood where they modulate axonal and dendritic growth and remodeling, membrane receptor trafficking, neurotransmitter release, synapse formation and function.10 The neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has emerged as crucial mediator of neuronal plasticity, suggesting that it might indeed bridge experience with enduring change in neuronal function.11BDNF acts on certain neurons of the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system, helping to support survival of existing neurons, and encouraging growth and differentiation of new neurons and synapses.12,13 S100B belongs to the family ofcalcium binding proteins, is expressed mainly by astrocytesand is found both intra- and extracellularly in brain tissue. It was also reported that mature myelinating and non-myelinating Schwann cells of peripheral nerves strongly display S100 protein immunoreactivity (Stefansson et al., 1982; Sugimura et al., 1989; Vega et al., 1996).14 S100B can spill from injured cells and enter the extracellular space or bloodstream. Serum levels of S100B increase in patients with neuronal damage. Over the last decade, S100B has emerged as a candidate peripheral biomarker of neuronal injury. Elevated S100B levels accurately reflect the presence ofneurodegenerayion. Its potential clinical use in the therapeutic decisions is substantiated by a vast body of literature. Thus, the major advantage of using S100B is that its elevatio in serum provides a sensitive measure for determining neuronal injury at the molecular level before gross changes level.15
Conditions
- Investigation the Role of BDNF and S100B Serum Level as a Predictive of Outcome of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment Lumbar Disc Prolapse Patients
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Pulsed mood radiofrequency on dorsal root ganglion
3\) Pulsed radio frequency (PRF): PRF of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) will be performed to all participants in this study. The procedures will be performed in the operating room under fluoroscopic guidance following radiation safety standards. The dorsal root ganglion of lumbosacral roots will be targeted. The patients will be positioned prone .Lidocaine 1% will be infiltrated at the skin entry site. A 10 cm, 22-gauge radiofrequency needle with a 5 mm curved active tip will be used. A radiculogram will be done to confirm appropriate placement and DRG will be stimulated for confirmation of the appropriate nerve root involved. Proximity of the needle to the DRG will be determined by appropriate sensory stimulation with 50 Hz (0.4-0.6 V), and motor stimulation at 2 Hz will be used to determine a threshold 1.5-2.0 times greater than the sensory threshold to avoid placement near the anterior nerve root. A pulsed lesion will be generated by applying 45 V to the DRG for 6 minutes at 42°C.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Beni-Suef University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-07-01
- Completion
- 2022-09-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy and Cost: Benefit Ratio of 0, 1, and 2 Medial Branch Blocks for Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Denervation
NCT00484159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Neuroplasty Using Epidural Catheter Combined with Pulsed Radiofrequency (versus Pulsed Radiofrequency Alone
NCT06711419 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Improvement of Low Back Pain After Decompression in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis
NCT05791422 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Placebo-controlled Trial of Transdiscal Radiofrequency Annuloplasty
NCT00750191 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
RFA Using Multi-Tined Electrodes vs.Traditional Electrodes for Lumbar Spondylosis
NCT06477094 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Nerve Root Block With Ultrasound Guidance Improves Surgical Outcome of Selective Discectomy in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Disc Disease
NCT05145530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
High Power Laser Therapy for Herniated Disc and Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06831227 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Neuropathic Pain and Postural Stability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT05115461 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty vs Percutaneous Nucleotomy vs Decompression Catheter in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00300898 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy
NCT03912519 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Initial Feasibility of Using the Neurolyser for Facet Related Low Back Pain
NCT03321344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Intra-articular Injection of PRP Versus Corticosteriods in Treatment of Lumbar Facet Disease
NCT04860531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Effectiveness, Security And Radiological Changes In Epiduroscopy For Lumbar Stenosis
NCT03863067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Factors for LBP Interventional Treatment Outcomes
NCT02329951 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HYBRID TELE-REHABILITATION VERSUS CLINIC-BASED THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
NCT07041476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Iovera Lumbar Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07214844 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study
NCT02002429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Discogen for Low Back Pain
NCT06611397 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PTED Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT03634046 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of PLDD Versus ESI in the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT05601791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Improve Interventional Outcomes for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy?
NCT00826124 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Aim of Study is to Identify the Predictive Factors for the Success of Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Treatment of Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06795542 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Value of Functional Anesthetic and Provocative Discography in the Surgical Treatment of Discogenic Pain
NCT01077947 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Threshold Response of Lumbar Selective Nerve Root Block in Predicting Good Outcome Following Lumbar Foraminotomy
NCT03801356 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Combined Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy and Neural Mobilization on Lumber Disc Prolapse
NCT07138300 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA