Comparison of Dwell Time of Open Versus Closed Type Peripheral Intravenous Cannula
NCT07182877 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-02-18
Summary
Studies have shown that stabilisation devices are associated with fewer complications and lower failure rates in peripheral catheters.3,6,7 Although closed-system peripheral catheters offer potential advantages, such as reduced manipulation of components and minimised blood spillage, more research is needed to understand their impact on outcomes. The ability of peripheral catheters to remain functional and in place without complications is crucial. While various clinical factors influence peripheral catheter performance, the composition and structure of peripheral catheters also affect their dwell time, which is defined as the duration at which the catheter remains functional after insertion. A study by McNeill et al. found that during the preintervention phase, about 62% of open-system peripheral catheters lost IV access within 36 hours, with less than 10% remaining functional beyond 72 hours. The dwell time of closed-system peripheral catheters with a securement device increased to up to 96 hours during the intervention period.8
Conditions
- Thrombophlebitis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Closed-type peripheral cannula
We will use closed-type peripheral catheters (BD Nexia Closed IV Catheter System.
- DEVICE
-
Open type peripheral cannula
We will use POLYMED Ultra Intravenous cannula in the control arm
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Inderpaul S Sehgal, DM · PGIMER, Chandigarh
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-01
- Completion
- 2026-01-31
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Mini Midline Catheters With Different Placement Sites: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06106659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orogastric Versus Nasogastric Intubation
NCT03670238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Axillary Artery vs Femoral Artery Cannulation.
NCT02801825 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access by Critical Nurses.
NCT02285712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CATCH - Catheter Infections in Children
NCT01029717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Versus Jugular Central Venous Catheterization
NCT02624323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Phase Infections Risk Between Midline and Piccline Caheters: MIDLINE AND PICCLINE CATHETERS
NCT05264402 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ultrasound Guided Catheter Length Survivability
NCT03655106 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Power Injectable Versus a Non-Power Injectable, Upper Arm, TIVAD for Chemotherapy
NCT02282449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Pvc or Silicone Gastric Calibration Tube During Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04170322 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Evaluation of the Vascular Anatomy of the Neck to Minimize the Accidental Risk of Vascular Puncture During Percutaneous Tracheostomy
NCT06002178 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Midline Catheter Versus Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in Hospitalized Adult Patients
NCT05884294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Task Delegation to ICU Nurses for Midlines' Placement
NCT04155723 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Reduction of Complications Associated With PICC Management
NCT06944327 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of PIVC Length and Gauge on Catheter Indwell Time
NCT04344314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurological Intensive Care
NCT01495429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Site Selection of Short Peripheral Venous Catheters
NCT03290573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Flexible Catheter Materials on Catheter Angle and Blood Vessel Irritation
NCT06927141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Economic Comparison of 2 Methods of Intubation Tube Fixation : AnchorFastTM Versus Current Cord Fixation
NCT06533436 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Central Venous Catheter Placement With Thoracic Ultrasound and Intracavity ECG Positioning
NCT07291869 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Research Study to Test (2) Two Different Types of Feeding Tubes Used in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT00245687 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
In-line Filtration Reduces Postoperative Phlebitis.
NCT03193827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CVCs Versus Midline Catheters
NCT06884176 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Education of Health Care Workers on the Maintenance of Venous Access Devices
NCT04692753 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement
NCT01870661 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA