Effect of Postural Changes on Postoperative Hypoxemia
NCT07161817 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1200
Last updated 2026-01-14
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which positioning strategy works better to prevent postoperative hypoxemia in surgical patients: semirecumbent positioning or lateral positioning. It will also learn about the safety and effectiveness of these two positioning approaches. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does semirecumbent positioning reduce the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia more effectively than lateral positioning? Does lateral positioning reduce the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia more effectively than semirecumbent positioning? What are the differences in patient comfort and recovery outcomes between these two positioning strategies? Researchers will compare semirecumbent positioning directly to lateral positioning to see which approach is more effective in preventing postoperative hypoxemia.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to either semirecumbent positioning or lateral positioning after surgery Have their oxygen levels and breathing monitored regularly during the postoperative period Receive standard post-surgical care with their assigned positioning strategy Be assessed for comfort levels and any positioning-related complications Have their recovery progress tracked throughout their hospital stay.
Conditions
- Postoperative Hypoxemia
- Position Differences
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Lateral positioning
Patients allocated to lateral positioning were placed at 90° on a horizontal bed, supported with a pillow to maintain neutral alignment of the spine and avoid hyperextension or forward flexion of the neck. No preference was specified for left or right lateral decubitus positioning, allowing flexibility based on patient comfort and surgical requirements.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Semirecumbent positioning
Patients in the semi-recumbent position were placed in the bed and the head of the bed was raised by 30 °, allowing flexibility based on patient comfort and surgical requirements.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yuhu Ma
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Yatao Liu, Doctor
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-10-01
- Completion
- 2028-10-01
More Related Trials
-
Physiological Studies in the Prone Position in Patients With ARDS
NCT06586736 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position in ARDS
NCT06854627 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Practices of Prone Positioning Ventilation in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe ARDS in Intensive Care Units: A Registry-Based Observational Study
NCT07284888 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Responses to Head-down Postural Drainage Position
NCT01668875 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Lying Position on Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients With Mechanical Ventilated and Spontaneously Breathing.
NCT06538051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
NCT02671721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemodynamic Effects of Two Modalities of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers - ICU Patients
NCT05365854 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels on Lung Recruitment Duration and Hemodynamics After Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07161466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Positioning and Prone Positioning in ARDS Patients
NCT06647784 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prone Positioning and Abdominal Binding on Lung and Muscle Protection in ARDS Patients During Spontaneous Breathing
NCT05826847 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Oxygen Saturation During Different Intraoperative Positions
NCT01744886 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of PPV and LVOT VTI During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
NCT07304661 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Effects of Extravascular Lung Water on Prone Position Efficacy in Patients With ARDS
NCT04635267 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Hemodynamic Effect of 2 Methods for Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver in Anesthetized Patients
NCT03215329 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effect of Different Inspired Oxygen Concentrations on Intraoperative Recruitment Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
NCT06746181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PP in Patients With Ultra-low VT
NCT06215209 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Optimal Interval for Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers Achieving 90% Lung Re-expansion During Intraoperative Ventilation
NCT07239557 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Alveolar Recruitment for One Lung Ventilation
NCT01652612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Positioning on Back Pain After TACE Among Patients With HCC
NCT03784469 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postural Recruitment Maneuver in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19 Infection
NCT04475068 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Preoxygenation With Positive Airway Pressure: a Comparison of the Supine and 25° Head up Position
NCT03861949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Negatively Fluid Balancing Speed for ICU Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03552601 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Early Mobilization Protocol in Patients in the ICU
NCT01769846 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Intraoperative Ventilation Mode on Hemodynamics and Lung Dynamics
NCT05776589 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
the Impact of Manual or Mechanical Ways to Perform PLR on the Accuracy of Evaluation of Fluid Responsiveness
NCT06285331 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA