A Trial to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Adults Visiting the Emergency Department

NCT07146763 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-05-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of interventions on guideline-concordant prescribing in Emergency Departments (ED). The study compares the effectiveness of feedback messages about potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) delivered by peer clinician prescribers or anonymous systems, compared to standard of care. The goal is to reduce PIM prescribing for older adults discharged from emergency departments.

Conditions

  • Inappropriate Prescribing

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Prescribing Feedback

Automated prescribing feedback messages are delivered to clinician prescribers in participating emergency departments. Messages are based on Geriatric Emergency Medication Safety Recommendations (GEMS-Rx) recommendations and include aspirational norms and benchmark comparisons. Depending on study arm, feedback is sent either from a credible peer messenger or through an anonymous messenger system.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

    collaborator NIH
  • Yale University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Daniella Meeker, PhD · Yale University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-01-15
Primary Completion
2027-05-31
Completion
2027-11-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07146763 on ClinicalTrials.gov