MedTrace Logo

Trehalose vs Glycine Air-Polishing in Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment

NCT07140146 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2026-02-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of trehalose powder compared to glycine powder when used in air-polishing during supportive therapy for peri-implant mucositis, a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues around dental implants.

A total of 40 adult patients with peri-implant mucositis will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with air-polishing using either trehalose powder (test group) or glycine powder (control group). Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. These include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS), in order to assess plaque accumulation, inflammation, and bleeding.

The primary objective is to compare the reduction in plaque levels between the two groups over the study period. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of changes in gingival inflammation and probing depths, as well as assessment of implant surface integrity through in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after treatment.

The aim of the study is to determine whether trehalose powder offers improved clinical outcomes and greater implant surface preservation compared to glycine powder in the non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis.

Conditions

  • Peri-implant Mucositis

Interventions

DEVICE

Trehalose Powder Air-Polishing

Air-polishing procedure using trehalose-based powder (particle size \<65 µm, low abrasiveness) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. The intervention is combined with non-surgical debridement using manual curettes and ultrasonic scalers. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Clinical outcomes assessed include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS). Implant surfaces are also evaluated in vitro using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess any surface alterations after powder application.

DEVICE

Glycine Powder Air-Polishing

Air-polishing procedure using glycine-based powder (particle size \~25 µm, amino acid composition) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients with peri-implant mucositis. This treatment is combined with standard non-surgical supportive peri-implant therapy involving manual and ultrasonic debridement. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). The intervention aims to reduce plaque accumulation and inflammation. Clinical parameters recorded include PI, BoP, PPD, and BS. Implant surfaces are also assessed in vitro via SEM to compare the effects of glycine versus trehalose on implant surface integrity.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Pavia

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Andrea Scribante, Associate Professor · University of Pavia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-30
Primary Completion
2026-06-01
Completion
2026-06-10

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07140146 on ClinicalTrials.gov