MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Safety and Clinical Effects of Straight and Articulated Instruments (ArtiSential) in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients, a Prospective Randomized Study

NCT07100431 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 76

Last updated 2025-08-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In patients with gastric cancer, gastrectomy can be performed via laparoscopic/robotic or open surgery. It is crucial to completely remove the tumor along with an adequate extent of lymph node dissection. The number of lymph nodes retrieved during gastrectomy is considered an important factor associated with the quality of the surgery and can serve as an indicator of the completeness of the procedure.

In particular, during the dissection of lymph node stations 8, 9, 11p and 12a - which are located near the superior aspect of the pancreas - pressure is often applied to the pancreas to secure an adequate surgical view. Recent studies have suggested that this may be associated with postoperative pancreatic complications.

It is believed that the use of articulating instruments during laparoscopic gastrectomy may enable a safer dissection of lymph nodes located above the pancreas. However, to date, there have been lack of studies comparing the safety and efficacy of articulating versus straight instruments in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the compare these two approaches.

Conditions

  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients, Who Are Scheduled for Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Articulating (experimental group)

1\. Surgical procedure On the day of surgery, random allocation to either the experimental or the control group will be perfored just before the start of the procedure. All of the surgery will be conducted laparoscopically. The control group will undergo surgery using a conventional straight laparoscopic instrument, while the experimental group will use an articulating instrument. The surgical procedure will be the same for both groups. The total time of surgery and the time spent on the supra-pancreatic lymph node dissection will be recorded during the procedure. The estimated blood loss during surgery will be also measured.

PROCEDURE

Control (control group)

2\. Postoperative follow-up Patients participating in this study will have the same postoperative care as those not participating in this study. To compare the degree of pancreatic injury, amylase and lipase levels will be measured in the serum and the peritoneal fluid frome the drainage on postoperative days 1 and 3. Postoperative complications will be classified and recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification for all complications occurring within 30 days after surgery. The dissected lymph nodes will be categorized by region, and the number of dissected lymph nodes will also be confirmed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gangnam Severance Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-06-22
Primary Completion
2023-12-15
Completion
2023-12-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07100431 on ClinicalTrials.gov