Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study
NCT07086417 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2025-07-25
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and biomechanical accuracy of a newly developed robot-assisted system for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. ACL injuries are among the most common sports-related injuries in active individuals and athletes, and reconstruction surgery is considered the gold standard for treatment. However, failure rates remain substantial-up to 10.3% in the general population and as high as 40% among high-demand patients, such as young athletes. One of the key technical factors contributing to graft failure is improper placement of the femoral and tibial bone tunnels during surgery, which affects graft isometry, kinematics, and long-term function.
This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial will include 120 adult patients with confirmed ACL rupture. Subjects will be randomly assigned to two groups: an experimental group undergoing robot-assisted arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, and a control group receiving traditional arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The investigational robot system is a custom-designed platform that integrates three primary modules: (1) preoperative planning, (2) intraoperative surgical assistance, and (3) biomechanical evaluation. The robot is designed to support precise tunnel positioning using CT/MRI fusion, dynamic motion tracking during surgery, and post-placement assessment of graft trajectory, potential impingement, and mechanical stability.
Preoperative planning includes 3D reconstruction from CT and MRI imaging to identify optimal anatomical positions for the femoral and tibial tunnels. During surgery, the robot allows the surgeon to perform the procedure in a semi-active "cooperative control" mode, combining robotic precision with the surgeon's decision-making and dexterity. Unlike existing robotic platforms, this system enables limited patient limb movement and real-time position tracking, making it uniquely suited for arthroscopic procedures.
The primary endpoint of the study is anterior tibial translation at 2 years postoperatively, measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer to compare surgical and contralateral knees. Secondary endpoints include subjective knee function scores (Lysholm, Kujala, and Tegner), CT and MRI evaluation of tunnel placement and graft integration, and physical examination results. Follow-up will occur preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively via in-person visits.
Sample size was calculated based on differences in Lysholm scores from prior navigation-assisted studies. With an alpha level of 0.05, a power of 0.90, and a 20% expected loss to follow-up, 60 patients will be enrolled in each group. Data will be analyzed using SPSS v22.0. Parametric and non-parametric tests will be applied as appropriate, including ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons, and Cochran's Q for repeated categorical variables. A p-value \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
This study is conducted by the Department of Sports Medicine at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, a leading orthopedic and trauma care center in China, affiliated with Capital Medical University. The project is supported by the Capital Clinical Special Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Research and Translational Application Program and involves collaboration with Beijing Tiansing Bomed Medical Devices Co., Ltd., which is responsible for the robotic platform development and maintenance.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. All patients will provide written informed consent before enrollment. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and local regulations.
Expected outcomes of this study include evidence of improved tunnel placement accuracy, enhanced functional recovery, and potentially reduced failure rates with robot-assisted ACL reconstruction. If successful, this research may contribute to broader adoption of robotic technology in arthroscopic sports medicine surgery and support future innovations in orthopedic surgical robotics.
Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Robot-Assisted Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
This intervention involves the use of a customized robotic surgical system to assist in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The system integrates preoperative planning with CT/MRI fusion imaging, intraoperative surgical guidance for femoral and tibial tunnel creation, and real-time biomechanical evaluation. The robot provides enhanced precision in tunnel positioning and graft placement compared to conventional techniques.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
This intervention uses standard arthroscopic techniques for ACL reconstruction without robotic assistance. Tunnel positions are determined manually using surgical landmarks and guides. Graft placement, tensioning, and isometry assessment are performed by the surgeon using conventional methods.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Star Sports Medicine Co., Ltd
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Chunyan Jiang
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-01-31
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03668717 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Cartilage Injury and Remodeling After ACL Rupture and Reconstruction: Functional Imaging and Biomarkers
NCT04970706 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Hybrid Remnant Repair
NCT05494073 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06856356 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Bicompartmental Arthroplasty
NCT03668704 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Effect of Internal Brace on Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction With BTB Autograft
NCT06542705 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes and Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee for Subjects With Primary Arthritis of the Knee Joint Involving One (UKA) Compartment (Medial or Lateral)
NCT06036212 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
L-C Ligament Versus Hamstring Autograft for Primary ACL Reconstruction
NCT02183727 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Reverse Drilling Technique in Improving Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT05994872 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Knee Arthroplasty - Retain the Anterior Cruciate Ligament or Not
NCT06264999 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Longitudinal Assessment of Cartilage Injury and Remodeling After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Reconstruction:
NCT03497780 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
A Study to Evaluate the Incrediwear Products Immediately After ACL Repair
NCT06668376 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Joint Arthroplasty
NCT03668691 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Does Addition of a Functional Knee Brace Improve Rehabilitation Outcome in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee?
NCT02712710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Obtain Safety and Effectiveness of CT-ACL001, a Regenerative Ligament Using Biological Tissue, in ACLR
NCT07129694 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Predictors of Anterior Patellofemoral Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT06185803 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Collagen for Treatment of Musculoskeletal Injuries
NCT06331741 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post-Market Study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03106558 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ACL Reconstruction with a New Generation of LARS Artificial Ligament
NCT06571955 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ACL Versus ALL + ACL Study
NCT03740022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Design, Prototyping, and Testing of a Robotic Prosthetic Leg
NCT04616378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Instrumentation, Computer Navigation, and Robotic Assistance Techniques in TKA
NCT05629715 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary ACL Reconstruction in Patient Over 40 Years: Allograft Versus Autograft
NCT06584838 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Study to Compare Two Techniques for Articular Cartilage Repair:ACIC Vs. MCIC
NCT01984450 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT05290818 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA