Comparison Between Laser and Open Fistula Surgeries in the Management of Fistula - In - Ano
NCT07083778 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2025-07-24
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the outcomes of laser versus open surgical techniques in the management of fistula-in-ano among 100 patients at a tertiary care center. Patients were diagnosed with intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistulas using clinical examination and MR fistulogram and were randomly assigned to undergo either laser surgery (n=50) or open surgery (n=50).
The primary endpoints included postoperative pain, hospital stay duration, and time to return to normal activity. Secondary outcomes assessed were recurrence, wound infection, incontinence, need for reoperation, and patient satisfaction.
Conditions
- FISTULA IN ANO
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laser Fistula Surgery (FiLaC - Fistula-tract Laser Closure)
A minimally invasive procedure using a radial fiber diode laser probe to ablate the fistula tract. Laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is applied circumferentially as the probe is slowly withdrawn, leading to shrinkage and closure of the fistula tract. The internal opening is closed with absorbable sutures. The procedure is done under spinal or general anesthesia.
- PROCEDURE
-
Open Fistula Surgery (Fistulotomy, Fistulectomy, or LIFT Procedure)
Patients in this group will undergo standard open surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Based on the type and location of the fistula (intersphincteric or transsphincteric), the surgical procedure may be: * Fistulotomy: Laying open the fistula tract. * Fistulectomy: Excision of the entire fistulous tract. * LIFT Procedure: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract, preserving the sphincter complex. This sphincter-sparing technique is chosen for transsphincteric fistulas when appropriate. All procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia. The choice of technique is individualized based on MR fistulogram findings and intraoperative assessment. Wounds are managed with regular dressings and allowed to heal by secondary intention. Standard postoperative care includes antibiotics, analgesia, and sitz baths. Follow-up is done at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
GSVM Medical College
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kamal Raj, MS surgery · GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE , KANPUR
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-08-01
- Completion
- 2025-09-01
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Closure of Anal Fistula (FiLaC)
NCT04161469 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Therapeutic Management of Complex Anal Fistulas by Installing a Closure Clip: Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02336867 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
LASER FiLaC™ (FISTULA LASER CLOSURE) : First-line Treatment of Complex Anal Fistulas
NCT05201209 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment of Anal Fistula With Lasercoagulation
NCT03017898 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) Versus Fistula-tract Laser Closure (Filac) Versus Conventional Seton in the Management of Anal Fistula
NCT04418323 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Lower Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula: Fistulotomy With Marsupialization vs Open Wound
NCT04722965 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Perirectal Fistula With Cutting Seton vs. Collagen Plug
NCT00450671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Anal Fistulae Internal Opening Closure by OTSC Clip After Video Assisted Tract Fulguration
NCT06243302 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Fistulotomy Versus Fistulotomy With Marsupialization
NCT05660876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Of Minimally Invasive Approach In The Surgical Treatment Of Complex Perianal Fistula
NCT06484660 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcome of Combined Partial Fistulectomy or Fistulotomy and Cutting Seton Procedure in High Perianal Fistula
NCT04796376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery
NCT01021774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TROPIS Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in High Anal Fistula
NCT07334678 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rectal Prolapse With ODS. STARR vs LVR.
NCT04892108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Versus Seton in the Management of High Peri Anal Fistula
NCT02313597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Assisted Treatment of Fistula In Ano
NCT05390151 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Versus Rectal Advancement Flap in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula
NCT05263661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
PRP Use in Treatment of Fistula Ano
NCT04187651 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Approaches to Lower the Chances of Recurrence of Anal Fistula After Surgery
NCT06380036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Modified Clipped-LIFT Procedure for High Transsphincteric or Suprasphincteric Fistula
NCT07102134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula
NCT05314205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study of the House Advancement Flap, Rhomboid Flap, and Y-V Anoplasty
NCT00883571 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Combined With or Without Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT03060330 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fistula-in-ano in Infants and Children
NCT05666609 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA