MedTrace Logo

Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) Versus Fistula-tract Laser Closure (Filac) Versus Conventional Seton in the Management of Anal Fistula

NCT04418323 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Anal fistula is a chronic inflammatory tract connecting an internal opening in the anal canal with one or more than one external openings in the perianal skin Aim of the work This prospective randomized control trial, we will compare video-assisted anal fistula treatment (Vaaft) and Fistula Laser closure (Filac) and conventional Seton as regards, recurrence rate as a primary outcome. Secondary outcome includes; operative and post-operative data, hospital stay, pain score, healing time, return to work and continence

Conditions

  • Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) versus Fistula-tract Laser Closure (filac) versus Conventional seton in the Management of anal fistula

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) versus Fistula-tract Laser Closure (filac) versus Conventional seton in the Management of anal fistula

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-06-16
Primary Completion
2021-06-01
Completion
2021-06-02

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04418323 on ClinicalTrials.gov