Etomidate Combined With Propofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in High-Altitude Patients During Gastroscopy: a Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial
NCT07079176 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 732
Last updated 2025-07-22
Summary
One of the most common adverse events during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy is hypoxemia, which can lead to serious consequences. When sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed in high-altitude regions with thin air and lower atmospheric pressure, the risk of hypoxemia in patients significantly increases. Traditionally, propofol is the primary agent for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, offering rapid onset and recovery. However, propofol has many side effects, the most important of which is inhibition of respiration and hypotension. Etomidate has less effect on respiration compared to propofol. But there are also adverse reactions of etomidate such as muscular tremor, nausea and vomiting. This study aims to explore whether the etomidate combined with propofol anesthesia method can reduce the risk of hypoxemia during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy in high-altitude regions, compared to the traditional propofol anesthesia method .
Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Interventions
- DRUG
-
etomidate combined with propofol
Patients initially received oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 L/min. All patients underwent routine noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure, ECG, and oxygen saturation. In the EP group, patients received 50 μg fentanyl, followed by a slow intravenous injection of a propofol-etomidate mixture (10 mL:20 mg etomidate + 10 mL:100 mg propofol) at 0.1-0.2 mL/kg. Supplemental doses of 0.05 mL/kg were administered as needed to maintain sedation throughout the procedure.
- DRUG
-
propofol
Patients initially received oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 L/min. All underwent routine noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure, ECG, and oxygen saturation. In the P group, 50 μg fentanyl was administered, followed by a slow intravenous injection of propofol (1-2 mg/kg) after 3 minutes. Supplemental doses of 0.5 mg/kg were administered as needed to maintain sedation throughout the procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
RenJi Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-08-01
- Completion
- 2028-04-30
More Related Trials
-
Safety of Etomidate-propofol Mixture vs. Propofol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
NCT07019246 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety of Etomidate - Propofol Mixture vs Propofol in Total Intravenous Anesthesia During Abdominal Surgery
NCT05810363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Etomidate Induction in Hysteroscopic Surgery
NCT05520645 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Esketamine Combined With Different General Anesthetics on Quality of Postoperative Recovery
NCT06976996 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Low-Dose Esketamine Combined With Ciprofol on the Quality of Early Postoperative Recovery Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy
NCT06617039 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Propofol Versus Midazolam in Sedation for Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
NCT06358131 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
A Comparison of Injection Pain of Propofol During Endoscopy : LCT Propofol vs MCT/LCT Propofol
NCT02567916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of Topical Pharyngeal Anesthetics on Discharge of the Patients When Used in Conjunction With Propofol Sedation in Routine EGD's
NCT02507440 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparative Study of Rimazolam and Propofol Combined With Etomidate in Gastroenteroscopy in Elderly Patients
NCT05103696 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy
NCT05497492 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Different Anesthetic Technique For ERCP
NCT04087668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oropharyngeoesophageal Topical Anesthesia Versus Propofol - Ketamine Sedation for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
NCT06566326 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Remimazolam on the Incidence of Severe Hypoxia During Sedated Hysteroscopy for Assisted Reproduction in Overweight or Obese Patients
NCT06187896 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effective Dose of Remimazolam Combined With Propofol in Painless Gastroscopy
NCT05876793 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Anesthetic Techniques and Palonosetron Administration on the Incidence of PONV
NCT02809378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Construction and Effectiveness Evaluation of Painless Digestive Endoscopy Mode Led by Anesthesia Nurses Under the Guidance of Anesthesiologists
NCT06712264 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Respiratory and Hemodynamic Implications of Endoscopic Myotomy of the Esophagus and Stomach
NCT05602272 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: General Anesthesia With Opioid Versus General Opioid Free Anesthesia
NCT02953210 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Etomidate to Improve Outcome in Elderly Patients
NCT02910206 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Leg Elevation and Leg Wrapping in the Prevention of Propofol Induced Hypotension
NCT02845921 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Preventive Effects of Sub Hypnotic Dose of Propofol for Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Hemabate
NCT03185156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sedation-related Complications During Gastroenterological Procedures
NCT05563727 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Etomidate vs Propofol-Induction Characteristics
NCT02807610 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Optimizing Propofol in Obese Patients
NCT00270335 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures
NCT03567928 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA