The Effect of Mandibular Advancement With Clear Aligners on Maxillary and Mandibular Volumes
NCT07056829 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 55
Last updated 2025-07-09
Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different orthodontic treatment methods used in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion, a condition in which the lower jaw is positioned backward. Approximately 80% of Class II malocclusions are due to mandibular retrusion. Therefore, functional appliances that stimulate mandibular growth in growing individuals have been widely used in orthodontics for many years.
In recent years, clear aligner systems have become increasingly popular in orthodontic practice. A mandibular advancement feature was recently integrated into these aligners, allowing for simultaneous tooth alignment and forward positioning of the lower jaw. In this study, the newly developed Mandibular Advancement Appliance (MAA), based on clear aligners, will be compared to the traditional functional appliance known as the Activator.
Who Can Participate in the Study? Children with retrusive lower jaws who are in the growth and development period Individuals with no prior orthodontic treatment Patients with specific levels of dental protrusion (overjet) Those with good general health and no contraindications for CBCT imaging What Will the Treatment Process Involve?
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:
MAA group (clear aligners with mandibular advancement) Activator group (traditional removable appliance) Control group (no treatment, only observation) The active treatment period will last approximately 7-8 months, followed by a retention phase. All patients will be monitored regularly, and strict adherence to appliance use will be expected.
How Will the Outcomes Be Assessed? Before and after the treatment period, participants will undergo cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans to obtain detailed three-dimensional images of the jaws. These images will be analyzed to evaluate volumetric changes. All measurements will be performed by a trained orthodontic specialist using dedicated software.
Potential Benefits for Participants:
Participants will receive close clinical monitoring throughout the study period. The use of advanced imaging technologies may support the development of more effective and individualized treatment plans.
Safety and Confidentiality:
This study has received ethical approval and will be conducted in accordance with relevant data protection and research ethics standards. All personal data will be kept confidential. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians.
Conditions
- Mandibular Retrognathia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Mandibular Advancement Appliance (Invisalign MA)
Clear aligner system with integrated buccal precision wings to posture the mandible forward. Advancement protocol: 2 mm increments every 8 weeks. Total active treatment duration: \~8.15 months, followed by retention phase. Patients instructed to wear aligners ≥20 h/day, removing only for eating and oral hygiene.
- DEVICE
-
Activator Appliance
Traditional removable functional appliance fabricated on a standardized bite registration. Patients instructed to wear appliance 24 h/day except during meals and sports. Total active treatment duration: \~7.15 months, followed by retention phase.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Batman University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-01
- Completion
- 2025-06-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances
NCT05371691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Protraction Facemask and Upper Braces for Underbite Correction in Growing Children
NCT06759896 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects
NCT03159962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Side Effects of Different Treatment Methods
NCT06709287 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances
NCT06366737 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods
NCT07262892 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With Expander
NCT06116500 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Appliance Effects on Mandibular Soft Tissues
NCT06935032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bio-creative Therapy for En Masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth
NCT03239275 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
NCT05684510 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Invisalign® System with Mandibular Advancement
NCT06651944 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rapid Maxillary Expansion with Low Level Laser Therapy
NCT05586997 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Effect of Functional Treatment of Patients With Backward Positioned Chins on the Jaw Joint and Movements
NCT03645343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency, Efficacy, Periodontal & Occlusal Outcomes for Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in Crowded Incisor Treatment
NCT06731465 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Micro-osteoperforations on Lower Anterior Crowding Using Clear Aligners
NCT07169968 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
NCT05950581 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Distalization and Functional Appliance Therapy
NCT03252782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Aligners vs ABT and RCOS for Deep Bite Correction: CBCT Study
NCT07096401 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Open Bite With Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics
NCT06936371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Effects in Class II Patients Treated With Distalization
NCT05298280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Acrylic and Clear Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Crossbite in Children
NCT06792513 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA