MedTrace Logo

Resorbable vs Non-resorbable Bone Substitute at Immediate Post-extractive Single Implants

NCT07047131 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-07-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares two bone graft materials used when placing a dental implant right after tooth removal. One graft fully dissolves (GTO®), the other only partly (Apatos®).

The goal is to see which one better preserves bone and improves appearance around the implant.

Conditions

  • Tooth Extraction
  • Bone Graft
  • Alveolar Bone Loss
  • Dental Implant

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

GTO® (fully resorbable bone substitute)

Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous porcine bone mix + thermogelling copolymer with collagen (GTO®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®)

BIOLOGICAL

Apatos® (partially resorbable bone substitute)

Porcine cortical bone granules (Apatos Cortical®, OsteoBiol®, Tecnoss®) stabilized with TSV Gel®, a thermogelling copolymer with collagen.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Marco Esposito

    lead NETWORK

Principal Investigators

  • Marco Esposito, Dentistry · Associate Professor

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-18
Primary Completion
2025-12-20
Completion
2030-12-20

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07047131 on ClinicalTrials.gov