MedTrace Logo

Subcision Followed by Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite Injection Versus Subcision Followed by Painting CROSS TCA Technique for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars

NCT07028567 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 13

Last updated 2025-06-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of subcision followed by diluted calcium hydroxyapatite injection versus subcision followed by the painting original chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) technique using trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.

Conditions

  • Subcision
  • Calcium Hydroxylapatite
  • Trichloroacetic Acid
  • Atrophic Acne Scar

Interventions

DRUG

Calcium hydroxylapatite filler

Patients received calcium hydroxylapatite filler (CaHA) (Radiesse®).

DRUG

Painting chemical reconstruction of skin scars trichloroacetic acid technique

Patients received painting chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) technique.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-01-01
Primary Completion
2023-06-22
Completion
2023-06-22

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07028567 on ClinicalTrials.gov