Comparing Outpatient and Inpatient Use of a Cervical Balloon for Starting Labor in Low-Risk Pregnancies.
NCT06983535 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 358
Last updated 2025-05-21
Summary
Why was this study done? About 20-30% of pregnancies involve labor being started artificially, known as induction. One way to do this is with a balloon catheter placed in the cervix, which helps prepare the body for labor. This mechanical method works just as well as using medication but may be safer for the baby, as it reduces the chances of the womb contracting too much (which can cause stress to the baby). Because it's safe and simple, this method could possibly be done at home instead of in the hospital.
What was the aim of the study? The researchers wanted to compare how safe and effective this balloon method is when used at home (outpatient) versus in the hospital (inpatient). They also wanted to know how satisfied women were with each approach.
How was the study done? The study took place at four hospitals in Belgium between 2017 and 2023. It included women with healthy low risk pregnancies who were scheduled for induction for non-urgent reasons, such as being past their due date, having a large baby, or by personal choice after 38 weeks of pregnancy.
The women were randomly placed into two groups:
Outpatient setting: going home after balloon placement.
Inpatient setting: staying in the hospital after balloon placement\<
The main thing researchers measured was whether the baby's heart rate pattern (checked by CTG monitoring) was abnormal after 12 hours. They also looked at how the baby was born (vaginal birth or C-section), how long labor took, whether additional medicine was needed, pain management, and how satisfied the mothers were with the process.
Conditions
- Induction of Labor
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
cervical balloon catheter
Patients will be randomized to inpatient or outpatient setting while having the cervical ripening balloon catheter
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge
collaborator OTHER -
University Hospital, Antwerp
collaborator OTHER -
Jessa Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Zoe Pieters · Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-15
- Primary Completion
- 2023-11-15
- Completion
- 2024-02-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Belgium
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
NCT03752073 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Balloon Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02793609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Induction of Labor With Single and Double Balloon Catheters, a Randomized Controlled Study
NCT01091285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outpatient Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Transcervical Catheter in Low-risk Pregnant Women: a Two-centre Open Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial - OutCRIB
NCT07265518 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
NCT01720394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Study of Pessary Versus Standard Management in Women With Increased Chance of Premature Birth
NCT00735137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
NCT02477085 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Control Trial of Intracervical Balloon Placement vs Oxytocin in Women With Term PROM and Unripe Cervices
NCT03172858 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparative Study of Induction of Labor With a Cervical Ripening Double Balloon vs Foley Catheter
NCT00501033 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Foley Balloon With or Without Traction for the Cervical Ripening
NCT01063244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Randomized Trial of Induction Methods in Premature Rupture of Membranes
NCT03744078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dilapan-S Versus Double Balloon Catheter (CRB) for Preinduction of Labor at Term
NCT07010653 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intracervical Catheters for Induction of Labour in Women With Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term
NCT00890630 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Combined Foley Catheter Balloon and PGE2 Vaginal Ovule for Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized Study
NCT02861079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Management of Labor in Patients With Previous Cesarian Section
NCT02196103 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Cervical Ripening BALLoon (Cook) to the DINOprostone (Propess) for the Cervical Maturation in Case of Unfavorable Cervix (Bishop <6) in the Population of Obese Pregnant Women (BMI >= 30 kg/m²)
NCT02649920 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Outpatient Labor Induction With the Transcervical Foley Balloon
NCT02210598 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for Women With PrOlongedPregnancies
NCT02907060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
NCT06438081 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervix Uteri "Resistance" Measurements
NCT03948932 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparing Foley Catheter Balloon With Early Amniotomy for Induction of Labor at Term
NCT03629548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Ripening With Cook Catheter Plus Low Dose Oxytocin
NCT02465164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening
NCT05062343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Foley Catheter Versus Cervidil for Induction of Labor at Term
NCT01402050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Balloon Catheter Compared With Double Balloon Catheter for Ripening of the Unfavorable Cervix
NCT00690040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA