Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming

NCT06438081 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2024-07-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.

Conditions

  • Delivery Problem

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Cook double-balloon catheter

To compare whether Cook double-balloon catheter or Propess able to achieve vaginal delivery with a shorter priming to delivery interval

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The University of Hong Kong

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yin Fong Leung, MBBS · The University of Hong Kong

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-01
Primary Completion
2025-06-01
Completion
2025-12-01
FDA Drug
Yes
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Hong Kong

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06438081 on ClinicalTrials.gov