Dilapan-S Versus Double Balloon Catheter (CRB) for Preinduction of Labor at Term
NCT07010653 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126
Last updated 2025-06-08
Summary
Induction of labor (IOL) is a frequently performed procedure in obstetrics, aimed to achieve vaginal delivery when continuing the pregnancy is no longer advisable. A key determinant of IOL success is cervical ripening, particularly when the cervix is initially unfavorable. A range of preinduction methods is available, encompassing both mechanical and pharmacological approaches. Among mechanical techniques, the double balloon catheter (CRB) facilitates cervical dilation by applying direct pressure, which stimulates local prostaglandin release. In contrast, Dilapan-S, a synthetic osmotic dilator, works by gradually expanding through the absorption of cervical fluids, thereby applying gentle mechanical pressure.
While both methods are widely used and generally considered safe, there is limited evidence directly comparing their effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes. Mechanical methods are associated with a lower risk of uterine hyperstimulation compared to pharmacological alternatives. The choice between CRB and Dilapan-S may significantly influence labor duration, cesarean delivery rates, maternal comfort, and hospital resource utilization. This study aims to fill the existing knowledge gap by directly comparing Dilapan-S and CRB for term preinduction, with a focus on clinical efficacy and maternal satisfaction.
Conditions
- Induction of Labor
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Higroscopic Cervical ripening
Participants assigned to the Dilapan-S group will have 3 to 5 rods inserted under aseptic conditions. Placement will follow manufacturer instructions, and rods will remain in place for up to 12 hours unless spontaneous labor or device expulsion occurs earlier. Upon removal, cervical status will be assessed, and induction will continue with prostaglandins or oxytocin based on standard care.
- DEVICE
-
Cervical ripening via CRB
Double Balloon Catheter (CRB) Participants randomized to CRB will undergo insertion of a double balloon catheter with inflation of each balloon (approximately 80 mL saline each) according to established protocols. The catheter will remain for up to 12 hours or until spontaneous labor or expulsion. Post-removal management will mirror that of the Dilapan-S group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Roma La Sapienza
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-30
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Induction of Labor in Women With Unfavorable Cervix: Dilapan Versus Foley Bulb
NCT02899689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction With Dinoprostone in Oppose to Cervical Ripening Balloon as a Factor of BMI.
NCT03033264 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of CRB in PROM Patients
NCT01736852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT of Cervical Ripening Double Ballon Catheter Prior to Dilation and Evacuation.
NCT07200115 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Outpatient and Inpatient Use of a Cervical Balloon for Starting Labor in Low-Risk Pregnancies.
NCT06983535 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital
NCT06053073 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home
NCT04739683 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert Versus Double Balloon Catheter for Preinduction Cervical Ripening
NCT03016442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Dilapan-S® for Induction of Labor The Feasibility Study
NCT04521062 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Foley Catheter Compared to the Foley Catheter Alone for Cervical Ripening
NCT03111316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening
NCT01390233 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cook Balloon Versus Propess After 12 Hours of Rupture of Membranes
NCT03310333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Foley Balloon With or Without Traction for the Cervical Ripening
NCT01063244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Randomized Control Trial of Intracervical Balloon Placement vs Oxytocin in Women With Term PROM and Unripe Cervices
NCT03172858 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
NCT01720394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical Cerclage for Preventing Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancies Without Prior Spontaneous Preterm Birth and With Short Transvaginal Ultrasound Cervical Length
NCT02746900 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
IntraCERvical Balloon Catheter in the Setting of Induction of Labor for Fetal Loss or Abortion
NCT06456164 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Cervical Ripening BALLoon (Cook) to the DINOprostone (Propess) for the Cervical Maturation in Case of Unfavorable Cervix (Bishop <6) in the Population of Obese Pregnant Women (BMI >= 30 kg/m²)
NCT02649920 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervix Uteri "Resistance" Measurements
NCT03948932 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Patient Satisfaction During Artificial Induction of Labor by Cervical Ripening
NCT05096104 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dilapan-S Osmotic Dilator in Pre-induction of Labor
NCT02098382 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Catheter (INDOBA)
NCT04163744 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Foley Catheter Versus Cervidil for Induction of Labor at Term
NCT01402050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Foley Catheter Versus Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening
NCT04687436 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mechanical Dilation of the Cervix in a Scarred Uterus
NCT03471858 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA