Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education

NCT06950918 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86

Last updated 2026-03-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Study Summary:

This quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study aims to compare the effects of Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw instructional models on theoretical knowledge acquisition, academic motivation, and class engagement among 86 third-year physiotherapy undergraduates enrolled in a theory-based public health course.

Primary Questions:

How does the hybrid Flip-Jigsaw model impact learning and motivation outcomes compared to FC alone?

Do FC and Flip-Jigsaw differ in enhancing theoretical knowledge, motivation, and participation?

Comparison: Researchers will compare the FC group (pre-class videos + in-class discussions) with the Flip-Jigsaw group (video-based pre-learning + structured peer teaching) to evaluate differences in outcomes.

Participant Tasks:

Attend lectures and complete pre-/post-knowledge tests.

Engage in practical sessions (FC: group discussions; Flip-Jigsaw: peer-led jigsaw activities).

Complete motivation surveys and participation assessments.

Significance: Addresses the gap in understanding Flip-Jigsaw's efficacy in physiotherapy education, despite prior reports on FC and Jigsaw's individual benefits.

Conditions

  • Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Educational Technology
  • Educational Interventions
  • Students
  • Undergraduate Health Professional Students

Interventions

OTHER

Experimental

This study is a quasi-experimental parallel group design comparing Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw models in a theoretically-oriented public health course. Both groups used the same pre-prepared video lectures to standardize content, but differentiated in-class strategies: The FC group used instructor-led discussions, while the Flip-Jigsaw group used Jigsaw technique and peer teaching (students learning subtopics in "expert groups" and teaching them in "master groups"). Unlike traditional FC, this hybrid model includes systematic peer collaboration and role-based accountability mechanisms. Theoretical knowledge acquisition, motivation and engagement outcomes were assessed through quantitative tests (pre-post-retention tests) and qualitative interviews, and objectivity was ensured in practical exams with single-blinded assessors. The study brings innovation to the literature as it is the first study to demonstrate the unique effect of Flip-Jigsaw in theoretical courses in the fie

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Suleyman Demirel University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Isparta University of Applied Sciences

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
25 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-05-10
Primary Completion
2026-06-10
Completion
2026-07-10

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06950918 on ClinicalTrials.gov