MedTrace Logo

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Analgesia

NCT06815094 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2025-02-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effect and safety of erector spinae plane block vs caudal epidural block in paediatric population undergoing lower limb cancer surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Which of them has a superior analgesic effect.
* which of them is more safe and has less complication rate. Participants or their guardians should agree to share in the study (after full explanation of risks and benefits) to receive one of the previously mentioned regional blocks in conjunction with the classic balanced general anaesthesia.

Conditions

  • Surgical Pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Regional analgesia either CEA or ESP

Ultrasound guided local anesthetic injection in the course of the conducting nerve to decrease pain transmission.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute, Egypt

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Atef Badran, MD · National cancer institute - Cairo university

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
8 Years
Max Age
15 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-11-28
Primary Completion
2023-11-14
Completion
2024-02-14

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06815094 on ClinicalTrials.gov