Comparative Study Between Caudal Epidural Block and Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries.
NCT05729308 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 78
Last updated 2023-02-15
Summary
It is widely believed that major lumbosacral spine surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain that may delay the functional recovery of the patient. Caudal epidural injection (CE) has an important role in providing effective pain relief post lumbosacral spine surgeries by blocking sensory input at the level of the spinal cord. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a relatively new technique of trunk fascial block which was introduced in 2016. Reports showed that ESPB significantly relieved postoperative pain in patients with lumbosacral spine surgery, reducing the use of analgesics.The overall benefit of intravenous (IV) analgesia versus pre-emptive analgesia by caudal epidural or erector spinae block is still controversial.
The aim of this study is to compare the pre-emptive analgesic effect of bilateral erector spinae plane block versus Caudal epidural analgesia versus the conventional intravenous analgesia in adult patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries under general anesthesia.
Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
caudal epidural block
The patient will be positioned in prone position, sterilized from the iliac crest margin to the lower buttock. Sacral horns will be palpated and sacral hiatus and epidural area will be determined at S4-S5 level through the ultrasound guidance using SonoSite M Turbo(USA).The scanning probe is the linear multi-frequency 6-13 MHz transducer (L25 x 6-13 megahertz linear array)that is covered in sterile plastic bag.Short axis (transverse view) is used first to identify the two sacral cornua as two hyperechoic reverse U-shaped structure "Frog sign" and the sacrococcygeal ligament in between and epidural space beneath. An 18-gauge epidural needle (length 90 mm) is used for direct puncture of sacrococcygeal membrane out of plane then the probe is rotated to long axis (longitudinal view) and the needle is seen in plane in the epidural space. Injection of 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will expand the epidural space
- PROCEDURE
-
bilateral erector spinae plane block
The patient will be in the prone position, after skin sterilization, ESP block will be performed at the level of T12. A curvilinear high-frequency ultrasound transducer will be placed sagittal 3 cm lateral to T12 spinous process where a hyperechoic shadow of the transverse process (TP) and erector spinae will be defined. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be inserted in cranial to caudal direction toward TP in plane to the ultrasound transducer until the needle touches the TP crossing the whole muscles. The location of the needle tip will be confirmed by visible normal saline solution separating erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the TP on ultrasound imaging. After confirming the needle site, 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected. The procedure will be repeated following the same steps on the other side
- PROCEDURE
-
general anesthesia with intravenous analgesia.
* Multimodal therapy with acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) will be used. * Vital data will be monitored as mentioned Intraoperatively, if the pulse rate and/or mean blood pressure increased above 20% of the baseline, IV fentanyl will be administered as an incremental dose of 50 µg. * The patients will be monitored for heart rate and blood pressure at regular 10-minute intervals. If blood pressure decreased more than 20% from baseline, then the patient will receive 500 mL saline infusion; if no response is seen, then 5 mg ephedrine will be administered. If heart rate decreased to 45 beats per minute, an IV injection of 0.1 mg /kg atropine will be administered.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-31
- Completion
- 2024-03-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
NCT06571188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgeries for Postoperative Pain
NCT06970704 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Epidural Analgesia With Bilateral Erector Spinae Block for Pain Management in Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT04320212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of High-thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Diaphragmatic Function in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT06721832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retrolaminar Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block as Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Posterior Lumbar Discectomy
NCT06725680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Control With Caudal Epidural vs. Combined Caudal Epidural and Lumbar Sympathetic Block .
NCT07199816 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
NCT06910696 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
NCT05596227 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Surgical Injection Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05630404 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbal Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT07240961 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Hip Replacement Surgeries
NCT04003909 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between ESPB Versus IV Morphine as Postoperative Analgesia After Spine Surgeries .
NCT05350696 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block In Lumbar Laminectomy
NCT04757480 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Injection ESPB Versus Single Injection ESPB for Laparotomies
NCT05633329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Injection
NCT06336161 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Supraumbilical Surgery
NCT05179928 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Block Vs Ketamine-based Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in Lumber Decompressive Surgery
NCT07001605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Dexmedotomidine in Lumber Spine Surgeries.
NCT06775418 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Laparotomies
NCT04965194 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Combining Erector Spinea Block With Non Opioid Infusions as Opioid Free Anesthesia in Spine Surgeries.
NCT05850468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Erector Spinae and Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Pain Relief After Femur Surgery.
NCT06990958 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05905510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block For Enhancement Of Quality of Recovery After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
NCT07166900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracotomy Patients
NCT03749395 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section
NCT04016688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA