Erector Spinae Block Versus PECS Block Type II for Breast Surgeries

NCT04284124 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2021-11-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this randomized, controlled prospective study is to compare the analgesic effect of US-guided ESP block versus PECs block in patients undergoing breast surgery for breast cancer in the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. We aim to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption within 24 hours

Conditions

  • Analgesia

Interventions

OTHER

Erector Spinae block

Patient in the prone position 20 min before induction of general anesthesia. Skin is sterilized by 10% povidone iodine. An US multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz) will be used for block. A 22G, 50-mm in length needle will be used and block will be performed at the T4 level of the spine using in-plane approach where a convex probe is placed 2-3 cm lateral to the spine using sagittal approach. Erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes are located and the needle will be inserted deep into the muscle. The needle is directed craniotomy-caudally. Correct position of the needle tip is confirmed with administration of 0.5-1 ml of local anesthetic to monitor spread then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for block performance. Distribution of local anesthetic is monitored in both cranial and caudal directions

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute, Egypt

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed Bakir, M.D · NCI Egypt

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-03-19
Primary Completion
2021-03-10
Completion
2021-03-10

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04284124 on ClinicalTrials.gov