MedTrace Logo

Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

NCT06799455 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2025-06-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Conditions

  • Multiple Pulmonary Diseases

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal tube

participants either receive the ETT during the procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • H. Erhan Dincer · University of Minnesota

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-06-02
Primary Completion
2027-03-31
Completion
2027-03-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06799455 on ClinicalTrials.gov