Ultrasound-guided Pigtail Catheter Versus Intercostal Tube Drainage of Non-traumatic Exudative Pleural Effusion

NCT06099054 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2023-10-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Primary Aims:

To compare the performance of pigtail catheter to that of ICT in drainage of pleural effusion of medical aetiology regarding:

1. Various complications(mainly wound pain) that result from either therapeutic approach.
2. Success of complete drainage.
3. Compare the duration needed for complete drainage.

Secondary Aims:

To evaluate both techniques in terms of:

1. Degree of patient's mobility that either technique permits.
2. Percentage of patients that can be managed on outpatient settings by either approach

Conditions

  • Pleural Effusion

Interventions

DEVICE

Pigtail catheter

Pigtail catheter will be inserted using Seldinger technique under US guidance to drainage exudative pleural effusion by a trained radiologist

DEVICE

Intercostal tube

Chest tube will be inserted according to BTS guideline for insertion of ICT by a trained thoracic surgeon

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hossam El-din Galal, Prof.Dr · Assiut Univeristy

  • Hamdy Mohammad Ibrahim, lecturer · Assiut Univeristy

  • Sara Mohammed Hashem, lecturer · Assiut Univeristy

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-12-01
Primary Completion
2027-12-01
Completion
2028-05-25

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06099054 on ClinicalTrials.gov