MedTrace Logo

Comparative Effectiveness of Ipsilesional High-frequency rTMS, Contralesional Continuous Burst Theta rTMS, and Sham rTMS, Each Combined With Physiotherapy, in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Upper Limb Recovery : Clinical, Neurophysiological and Radiological

NCT06799312 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2025-03-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the efficacy of lesional high-frequency rTMS, contralesional cTBS, and sham stimulation in improving motor and cognitive recovery in post-stroke patients undergoing physiotherapy.

Conditions

  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Stroke
  • Functional MRI

Interventions

DEVICE

Ipsilesional high frequency rTMS combined with physiotherapy

As mentioned in details in arms description.

DEVICE

Contralesional Continuous Burst Theta rTMS (cTBS) + Physiotherapy

As mentioned in details in arms description.

DEVICE

Sham rTMS + Physiotherapy

As mentioned in details in arms description.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-03-15
Primary Completion
2026-09-30
Completion
2026-12-31

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06799312 on ClinicalTrials.gov