Elective Adhesiolysis vs. a Wait-and-see Policy to Prevent Recurrences After Conservative Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT06777446 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 380
Last updated 2025-01-15
Summary
Rationale: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) is a frequent surgical emergency, associated with 3-8% hospital mortality and a high risk of recurrence (20% at two years of follow-up). ASBO can be treated conservatively or by emergency surgery. In the absence of bowel ischemia or strangulation, conservative treatment is often preferred, to avoid the excess morbidity and mortality from emergency surgery. Recent epidemiological studies, however, demonstrate a considerable higher recurrence risk of aSBO after conservative treatment that is associated with hospital readmissions and lower survival. Elective adhesiolysis following successful conservative treatment might reduce these long-term risks whilst avoiding the high complication rate of emergency surgery.
Objective: The investigators aim to assess the efficacy of elective adhesiolysis following conservative treatment for aSBO as compared to the current state of the art (wait-and-see policy) to prevent long-term recurrence of aSBO. Further the investigators will evaluate quality of life, healthcare and societal costs.
Study design: Multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial, including 380 patients.
Study population: Adult patients who recovered from aSBO by conservative treatment. Patients that are inoperable for medical, anaesthesiological or surgical reasons are excluded. Intervention (if applicable): The intervention of investigation is elective adhesiolysis. Adhesiolysis is an abdominal procedure in which all adhesions are cut, and adhesion prevention applied to reduce the risk of adhesion reformation. The intervention is compared to wait-and-see policy (the current standard treatment)
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is recurrence, defined as readmission for obstructive systems with aetiology of adhesions confirmed by CT. The investigators hypothesize a 50% reduction in recurrence in the intervention arm. Secondary outcomes are morbidity from surgery, health-related quality of life (EQ5D), healthcare costs and societal costs (iMCQ and iPCQ)
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
Patients in the intervention group are exposed to abdominal surgery, which is associated with a moderate risk of minor complications such as wound infection and haemorrhage, and a small risk of severe complications such as iatrogenic bowel injury. According to our hypothesis, a potential benefit is the reduction in the risk of recurrences. Recurrence of aSBO is associated with a risk of readmissions, reinterventions, and also increased long-term mortality.
Conditions
- Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Elective Adhesionlysis
See descriptions in study arms
- DEVICE
-
Adhesion barrier
At the end of adhesiolysis a barrier will be placed. The adhesion barrier to be used in laparoscopic adhesiolysis is Icodextrin 4% (Adepttm).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
collaborator OTHER -
KCE Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Radboud University Medical Center
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2029-02-28
- Completion
- 2034-02-28
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Belgium
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Mesh Placement
NCT02404545 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Parastomal Hernia Repair Utilizing the Retromuscular Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Mesh Techniques
NCT03972553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Mesh-RTL Project, for Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT04134455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylaxis of Ileostomy Closure Site Hernia by Placing Mesh
NCT02226887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Real-Life Use of Transabdominal Restorelle® Meshes in Apical Prolapse Repair
NCT06296316 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Prevention of Incisional Hernia by Mesh Augmentation After Midline Laparotomy for Aortic Aneurysm Treatment
NCT00757133 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Biologic Mesh
NCT04780048 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
PROphylactic Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernias at the Former Stoma Site: the PROMISS-trial
NCT03750942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Funnel Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia in Permanent End Colostomy After Abdomino-perineal Resection
NCT04793009 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ACELL Mesh for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
NCT03058731 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement for Stoma Closure
NCT06157645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Repair
NCT01189708 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Hernia Prevention in Stomas
NCT00907842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Only Mesh Fixation With Glue of Ventral/Incisional Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT06183840 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic eTEP Versus Open Rives-Stoppa
NCT05446675 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)
NCT04440514 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
NCT00908661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Long-term Resorbable Versus Non-resorbable Large Pore Synthetic Mesh.
NCT01622725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Biological Mesh (StratticeTM) for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia After Colorectal Surgery With Colostomy
NCT02121743 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal Mesh With 3cm Overlap Versus a Rives-Stoppa Repair With a 6cm Overlap in Hernia Umbilicalis
NCT00323141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT00509054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluate and Compare the Rate of Para-Stomal Herniation After Permanent Stoma Formation
NCT00577603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA