Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Long-term Resorbable Versus Non-resorbable Large Pore Synthetic Mesh.
NCT01622725 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 95
Last updated 2024-06-03
Summary
Since abdominal wall hernia repair is currently performed with the use of a mesh, side effects associated with the mesh are frequently reported during long term follow-up. These side effects are related to shrinkage of the mesh, adhesions to the bowl, pain, and inflammation of the skin and bowl. To reduce or prevent these effects, a fully resorbing mesh has been developed, which provides sufficient support and strength to allow efficient recovery of the abdominal wall, but also disappear from your body in three years time, so that you no longer have any synthetic material in your body. Previous resorbing meshes also disappeared but over a much shorter period of time, so that the hernia was insufficiently healed, with recurrence as a result.
The TIGR™ mesh (the resorbable mesh used in the study) is in principle a synthetic mesh, made of two commonly used polymers, however it will retain 50% of its initial strength after six months. This in theory is enough to provide support of the collagen healing process during the initial wound-healing phase, but also to support the transition of initial collagen to functional collagen.
The aim of this study is to compare TIGR™ with large pore mesh used in the repair of the anterior abdominal wall repair (incisional hernia, umbilical hernia, etc..Inguinal hernias are not part of the study).
Therefore the patients will be divided into two groups, one group will be treated with a resorbing mesh, the other group will be treated with a permanent mesh. Otherwise there will be no difference in the medication or the surgical techniques used.
Conditions
- Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Placing the resorbable mesh
Surgery for primary and secondary ventral hernia repair with placing of resorbable mesh.
- PROCEDURE
-
Non-resorbable synthetic mesh.
Surgery for primary and secondary ventral hernia repair with placing of non-resorbable synthetic mesh.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Novus Scientific
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University Hospital, Ghent
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Frederik Berrevoet, MD, PhD · University Hospital, Ghent
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2021-08-01
- Completion
- 2023-12-31
Countries
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Poland
- Spain
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias
NCT02451176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Results of Randomized Prospective Comparison of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Repair Techniques for Incisional Hernia
NCT02314091 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Sutures Versus Mesh in Umbilical Hernia Repair
NCT01635868 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long Term Outcomes Following Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT04578340 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Full-thickness Skin vs. Synthetic Mesh in the Repair of Large Incisional Hernia
NCT01413412 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Phasix Mesh Use in Complex Open Ventral Hernias Study
NCT04580524 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Heavy Weight Versus Medium Weight Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03082391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sublay Versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair in Large Ventral Hernias
NCT06643234 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Outcome After Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT04115150 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sutured vs Sutureless Mesh Fixation for Onlay Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT06209450 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Case-control Study of Mesh-infection After a Size Tailored Hernia Repair With C-Qur V-Patch
NCT01761708 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Risk of Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair With Mesh Fixation With Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Tacks
NCT01740882 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Late Mesh Complications After 3258 Incisional Hernia Operations
NCT02263612 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biologic or Synthetic Mesh
NCT02041494 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Primary Diaphragm Versus Mesh Repair for Hiatus Hernia: a Long-Term Follow-Up
NCT05662735 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Self-Expanding Multi-Layered Partially Resorbable Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh Device (Proceed Ventral Patch® Or Pvp®) For The Treatment of Small and Medium Umbilical Ventral Hernias
NCT01307696 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Parastomal Hernia Repair Utilizing the Retromuscular Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Mesh Techniques
NCT03972553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Fascial Closure With Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02363790 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Macroporous Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT02023203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA