Parastomal Hernia Repair Utilizing the Retromuscular Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Mesh Techniques
NCT03972553 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2023-12-04
Summary
This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing the retro-muscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retro-muscular keyhole mesh technique. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at two years. Secondary endpoints will be the incidence of mesh-related complications, all 30-day complication rates, and hospital length of stay. Patients eligible for the study will be 18 years or older with a parastomal hernia that requires open repair retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal as determined by one of five hernia surgeons who will participate in this study at the investigators' institution. All patients will be marked for a new stoma site preoperatively. Patients who have insufficient bowel length suitable for either technique will be excluded intraoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be entered in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database by the attending surgeon. The database houses patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes - all entered by the attending surgeon.
Conditions
- Parastomal Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Sugarbaker technique for repairing parastomal hernia
The bowel will be brought through the peritoneum lateral to the edge of the retromuscular mesh and then draped over the mesh before bringing it through the anterior fascia medially.
- PROCEDURE
-
Keyhole technique for repairing parastomal hernia
The bowel will be brought through defects in the posterior rectus sheath or contiguous peritoneum, mesh, and anterior fascia.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clayton Petro
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Clayton Petro, MD · The Cleveland Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-04-25
- Primary Completion
- 2023-11-27
- Completion
- 2023-11-27
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
NCT01639118 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Long-term Resorbable Versus Non-resorbable Large Pore Synthetic Mesh.
NCT01622725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Phasix Mesh Use in Complex Open Ventral Hernias Study
NCT04580524 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin
NCT03667287 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Parietex Plug and Patch Hernia System in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01590940 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia
NCT05599750 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post Market Study of Parietene™ DS Composite Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03495154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Heavy Weight Versus Medium Weight Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03082391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Gastropexy vs. No Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
NCT04007952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic or Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical Hernia
NCT00970515 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT00509054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Prospective Study in Patients Undergoing Primary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch
NCT01848184 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Complaints After Elective Repair for Small Umbilical or Epigastric Hernias
NCT01501682 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias
NCT01018524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
NCT01637818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes After Parastomal Hernia Repair
NCT03792243 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Paravertebral Blocks: Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT00587704 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short Term Outcomes of Heavy-weight Versus Medium-weight Synthetic Mesh
NCT06409091 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of AGN-151607-DP to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Adult Participants Undergoing Open Abdominal Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT07226791 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2