MedTrace Logo

Comparison of RTS and MGAP Scores in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients

NCT06744985 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-03-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and the MGAP score in determining clinical outcomes among multiple trauma patients hospitalized at a trauma center in Iraq.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Which score, RTS or MGAP, provides a more accurate prediction of clinical outcomes, including mortality? Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where one scoring system outperforms the other?

Participants will:

Be assessed using both the RTS and MGAP scores upon admission. Have their clinical outcomes, including mortality and other relevant indicators, monitored throughout their hospital stay.

Conditions

  • Multiple Trauma/Injuries

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Al-Nahrain University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bashar A Abdulhassan, Assistant professor of surgery · College Of Medicine - Nahrain University

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-01-20
Primary Completion
2026-12-10
Completion
2026-12-20

Countries

  • Iraq

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06744985 on ClinicalTrials.gov