Oral Care Apparatus for Intubated Patients
NCT06709183 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2024-11-29
Summary
There are several practical challenges in providing oral care to intubated patients. The presence of an endotracheal tube often makes it difficult to thoroughly evaluate the oral cavity, and there is a risk of tube displacement or removal during oral care. Additionally, the lack of standardized care protocols, limited time, and inadequate equipment further complicate the assessment of oral mucosal membranes, increase the likelihood of complications, and prolong ICU stays. The literature also highlights that intubated patients often exhibit behaviors such as gagging, biting the tube, or turning their head during oral care. These actions make it challenging for ICU nurses to use oral care tools effectively, resulting in insufficient evaluation and cleaning of the oral cavity. In a study conducted by Dale et al., ICU healthcare workers emphasized the need for an oral device that could withstand biting pressure, keep the teeth separated, and be flexible enough to prevent discomfort while enabling effective oral care. However, the literature does not report the existence of a device designed to open the oral cavity for intubated patients during oral care. Inspired by cheek retractors used in dentistry, this project aims to design an oral care retractor specifically for intubated patients. This device would facilitate the evaluation of the oral cavity and provide a clear view during oral care, enabling effective oral hygiene practices.
Conditions
- Intensive Care
- Oral Care
- Intubated ICU Patients
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Intervention-Control
Nurses in this group will start the first oral care practice by using the oral care retractor on the model. Before starting the procedure, the nurses will fill in the 'Beck Mouth Assessment Guide' and after the procedure, they will fill in the 'Oral Care Practices Evaluation Form'. A rest period of at least 10 minutes will be provided before the second oral care application. Standard oral care will be applied during the second application. Similarly, nurses will complete the 'Beck Oral Assessment Guide' before the procedure and the 'Oral Care Practices Assessment Form' after the procedure. At the end of both procedures, nurses will complete the 'Quebec Assistive Technology User Satisfaction Assessment Questionnaire (Q-ATUSA)' and the 'Interview Form'. The 'Interview Form' will be used to collect nurses' experiences and opinions about the oral care procedure. During the interview, audio recordings will be made with the knowledge of the nurses.
- OTHER
-
Control - intervention
In the first oral care procedure, nurses in this group will perform standard oral care on the model without using the oral care retractor. They will complete the 'Beck Oral Assessment Guide' before the procedure and the 'Oral Care Practices Evaluation Form' after the procedure. There will be a rest period of at least 10 minutes before the second oral care procedure. During this procedure, the second group of nurses who initially perform standard oral care will perform oral care using an oral care retractor. Similarly, they will complete the 'Beck Oral Assessment Guide' before the procedure and the 'Oral Care Practices Evaluation Form' after the procedure. At the end of both procedures, nurses will complete the 'Quebec Assistive Technology User Satisfaction Assessment Questionnaire (Q-ATUSA)' and the 'Interview Form'. The 'Interview Form' will be used to obtain nurses' experiences and opinions regarding oral care practices..
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-30
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Intubation Checklist in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT06791317 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Post-extubation Assessment of Laryngeal Symptoms and Severity
NCT03726086 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Standard Versus Flexible Tip Bougie for Videolaryngoscopy
NCT04973176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bougies as Aid for Endotracheal Intubation Via Video Laryngoscopy During Continuous Chest Compressions
NCT05689125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The USE of ULTRASONOGRAPHY in CONFIRMING SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE PLACEMENT in PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
NCT06664294 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Techniques for Tracheal Tube Exchange in Standard and Critical Care Patients
NCT04158271 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Double Lumen Tube Intubation Difficulty With Photo-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
NCT06839261 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Indirect Laryngoscopy and Ultrasonography in Prediction of Difficult Airway
NCT04226703 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison Between Using Video Stylet and Video Laryngoscope in Difficult Intubation of Traumatic Patients .
NCT05143346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Endotracheal Tube Fluctuation With Epigastric Compression Be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?
NCT06542406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Insertion of Different Supraglottic Airway Devices on Manikin
NCT05523752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Mask Supreme and I-Gel in Edentulate Geriatric Patients
NCT03760679 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Nasotracheal Intubation Using Shikani Optical Stylet
NCT00963677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Awake Fiberoptic And Awake Video Laryngoscopy Tracheal Intubation in Cervical Surgery
NCT03734965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pressure Support Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Air Way Pressure (CPAP) Using I Gelin Adult Patients,
NCT05116839 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Orotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Comparison of Standard Airtraq , Nasotracheal Airtraq Combined With a Stylet Inserted Endotracheal Tube and Standard Airtraq Combined Fiberoptic Intubation
NCT03709524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Videolaryngoscopes on Intubation Success in Obese Patients
NCT03402581 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Size 1 I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask
NCT01704118 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Surgeries With Lateral Position Under General Anesthesia
NCT06782841 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA