MedTrace Logo

Esthetic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants Receiving Immediate Provisionalization and Delayed Restoration

NCT01925339 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2019-02-18

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different timings of restoring dental implants that are placed right after tooth extraction: The test group will have the provisional crown placed at the time of implant placement. The control group will have the tooth removed and the implant placed at the same appointment but restorations placed after 4 months. Both procedures currently are accepted methods for replacing missing teeth but direct comparisons of the two procedures are lacking. The results of this study should aid clinicians in selecting the best timing for restoring implants for their patients. The hypothesis is that immediate restoration might increase aesthetic outcomes, e.g. less mucosal recession.

Conditions

  • Tooth Diseases
  • Tooth Extraction
  • Dental Implant

Interventions

DEVICE

Test (immediate restoration)

Test (immediate restoration)

DEVICE

Control: delayed restoration

Control: delayed restoration

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD · University of Michigan

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-12-31
Primary Completion
2018-03-15
Completion
2018-03-15

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01925339 on ClinicalTrials.gov