The Impact of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia on Return of Bowel Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Ileal Conduit

NCT06688643 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58

Last updated 2024-11-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) on bowel function recovery after Bricker surgery.This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 72 patients with bladder cancer undergoing elective Bricker surgery, who were randomly assigned to either the ITM group (n=36) or the CEA group (n=36). Postoperatively, patients in both groups received either ITM or CEA for pain management, and postoperative bowel function recovery time, pain scores, PONV, itching, and other indicators were recorded.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

ITM group

Patients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.

DEVICE

EA group

Patients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Xiaguang Duan

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-01-25
Primary Completion
2024-11-01
Completion
2024-11-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06688643 on ClinicalTrials.gov